You have to choose 02
Would you rather have no arms, or no legs? && Why?
No legs | 34 | |
No arms | 6 |
Ask Your Question today
Would you rather have no arms, or no legs? && Why?
No legs | 34 | |
No arms | 6 |
Asode from normal things like eating and writing, id be really sad If I couldn't play the piano anymore
It'd be scary to have no arms in case you fell, you'd have nothing to grab hold of to stop yourself.
Since the job I work at requires both my arms and legs, I'd have to quit if I lose either. I could probably get a secretary job or any kind of work from home job if I still had my arms, so I'll go with losing my legs.
Legs are easier to replace. Feet make terrible hands for those that are forced to use their legs for everything.