You have to choose 02

Would you rather have no arms, or no legs? && Why?

No legs 34
No arms 6
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 14 )
  • YE

    One arm for high fiving, one leg for kicking ass.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • BleedingPain

    Asode from normal things like eating and writing, id be really sad If I couldn't play the piano anymore

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • JellyBeanBandit

    It'd be scary to have no arms in case you fell, you'd have nothing to grab hold of to stop yourself.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • libertybell

    I think I could do more having arms.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • raisinbran

    Neither, I need to lose weight anyway.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • mouldiwarp

    I meant to vote no legs

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Cuntsiclestick

    Since the job I work at requires both my arms and legs, I'd have to quit if I lose either. I could probably get a secretary job or any kind of work from home job if I still had my arms, so I'll go with losing my legs.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • WolfDude

    I'd have no legs. Then I could still be an artist. Easy choice for me

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • COVID-19

    Does the leg option include the third leg?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • YE

      Dude you know you can stand on your hard dick, right?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • LloydAsher

    Legs are easier to replace. Feet make terrible hands for those that are forced to use their legs for everything.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • chuy

    No legs...

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Somenormie

    No legs. Nuff said.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Ummitsstillme

    Could function a lot better with arms over legs.

    Comment Hidden ( show )