Would you kill rapists
Maybe | 16 | |
No | 35 | |
Yes | 64 | |
Want to but no | 39 | |
Want to | 13 |
Ask Your Question today
Maybe | 16 | |
No | 35 | |
Yes | 64 | |
Want to but no | 39 | |
Want to | 13 |
I'm going to need more context here. Why am I killing the rapist? Just because he's a rapist? I'd like to say that I probably would, because rapists are terrible people and they deserve to die. However, considering the fact that I've never actually killed a human before, I can't say for sure I would without knowing the circumstances specifically.
Trick question. None of you would have the guts, it's not as easy as you think.
No. Doing a larger crime on someone that done a bad crime is not rational.
Yes, they deserve to be punished appropriately, but murder is punishing a criminal by becoming a larger criminal.
In a world where false rape accusers get no jail time for trying to ruin a man's life completely, which could involve the man being raped in a worse way (anally), why would I say rapists should be killed? We should be focusing on false rape accusers, because they are the ones that are getting away with it. Atleast with rapists we can count on them being detained.
The scenario you are providing is beyond the point. It was not stated that the subject of the matter was -accused of raping-, what was stated was, "would you kill a RAPIST" that said, from the materials provided we could assume that it is indeed a proven and true rapist. Not a man tried or on trial.
Well said.
I think we should all try to reserve judgement whenever possible in cases such as these, considering how often people are falsely accused.
what in the hell? the man would be 'raped in a worse way' just because its anal? All rape is equally as bad, doesn't matter who or where it is! I believe that raping children, men, women in any place is all equally as bad!
No, don't be that annoying person, not all rape is the same, don't be so ignorant.
Being raped analy can cause medical problems, it would hurt far more, and if it was done by someone the same gender, you have to deal with that aspect.
No, all rape is not equally as bad, that is ignorant, and it's sickening you would say a child being raped is equally as horrifying as an adult being raped. That is just sick.
oh and the part about it hurting more, just because in your male fantasy mind women are always horny, doesn't mean that its not going to hurt vaginally. If a woman is not aroused it is incredibly painful.
No you have it backwards...its not worse when you are raped by the same gender, it worse when you are raped by a man, in any situation.
Nobody has the right to be raped no matter what, doesn't matter how young or old you are or if the person raping you is biologically the 'correct' gender to have sex with.
Excuse me? I thought all rape was as bad as eachother, but when you are raped by a "man" specifically, it is worse? So it's not as bad than when a woman rapes a man?
"Your male fantasy" just get the fuck out, will you? Stupid feminazi.
Even if it "does" hurt vaginally, it still does not hurt nearly as much as forced anal.
Just get out of here, you piece of irrational trash. You don't even deserve a response.
Did you just subtly say that men getting anal raped is worse than a man raping a woman or is that just me seeing things?
No rape is worse than another, it's all a violation of human rights and privacy and every fucker who rapes deserves to be killed.
Yes I did, and yes what I said is valid.
The vagina is supposed to be penetrated, the anus is not. So if someone is raped anally, it is going to be more painful.
Also, the man has to also deal with the whole stigma of homosexual acts put upon him.
Then there is rape of a child, where it would hurt them even more if anally raped due to that area being even smaller, so far more stretching of the flesh would happen and cause problems.
Yes, there are rapes worse than another, saying there isn't is being irrational. Am I saying that because there are worse types of rape than the rape not as harmful if not harmful at all? Ofcourse not.
Yes, it's all violations of human rights, just like all crimes upon someone else. Just because they all come under violation of someone's rights does not mean they are equally bad. Like I explained, all crimes are violating someone's human rights, so if crimes are equal on that perspective, then theft would be just as bad as rape, and so on.
No, they do not deserve to be killed, they deserve to serve the time given for raping someone. If we were to give put a bigger crime on someone (murder them) for a crime not as bad, then we would have to apply that reasoning to every other area. A woman beat up her husband? She should be raped. A man stole? He should have his arm cut off, and so on.
Civilization has come too far to rely on a barbaric way of thinking.
...So I suppose you're homophobic too right?
Also, if you think the anus isnt supposed to be penetrated what's your view on anal sex with a woman? Do you oppose that or are you all for that?
There's fuck all wrong with gays, it's natural, animals have been known to be gay and they aren't homophobic ether.
One, child rape isnt part of the original conversation and 2, even if it was, any kind of penetration involving a kid would fucking hurt like a bitch because they aren't fully developed or meant to have sex with anyone.
No, all rapes are as bad as one another, it's still the violent act of ruining someone's life and physically forcing them into a sexual act they dont want. When a woman is raped, there's a possibility that she gets pregnant, a guy cant get pregnant at all, but just because it was up his ass, doesn't make his rape worse than the woman's.
Okay look, I never said all crimes are equally as bad, you're just assuming that. Of course a thief isnt as bad as a rapist or a murderer. It's stupid to think they are. Some people have to steal to survive but rape and murder are just evil acts people do because they can.
Some people commit crimes just to get behind bars because in some countries prisoners get a better quality of life than those who dont have a big income of money.
Why does a rapist or murderer deserve a better quality of life than what they can get on the outside? That's just ridiculous.
Rape is as bad as murder, in fact in ways, it's worse. Because the victim has to live with the mental scars and the after effects for their whole damn lives, people who get murdered, while tragic dont have to suffer that pain for years and even decades on end.
You're right about that, it has. So stop thinking that way.
...What? How does homophobia come in to this in any way? The anus is not biologically meant for penetration, that is just a fact. I never said it can't be used, just that it is not supposed to be, and that if forced, it is far more painful.
There is a difference between forced anal sex and anal sex.
Usually there are preparations to make it easier to penetrate the anus when anal sex is used. A rapist is not going to use these preparations before raping someone.
Only if someone has originally had anal sex on a frequent basis, would it be less painful than someone that hasn't. The majority of people don't do anal, and even then, without the preparations and how anal sex is done, if forced without done correctly, even if having anal sex frequently, will still cause more pain than vaginal rape.
The fact that the vast majority of men have not tried anal penetration of themselves, their anus is not going to have experienced it, and so the anus would be stretched, causing more pain, where as the vagina is designed to fit an erect penis, and so would not feel the same pain as part of the body not meant to be stretched.
Stop jumping to conclusions. The anus was not meant for sex, just like the mouth wasn't. That doesn't mean that they can't make good ways of sexual pleasure when "properly" done, which again, a rapist is not going to properly do.
It's like how oral is also pleasuring, but if not done correctly (such as leaving the penis in someone's throat and holding them there), it can cause people to choke. Why? Because the penis is not supposed to be in the throat, that doesn't mean it can't be used as a method of pleasure when "done correctly".
______________________________________
"One, child rape isnt part of the original conversation and 2, even if it was, any kind of penetration involving a kid would fucking hurt like a bitch because they aren't fully developed or meant to have sex with anyone."
1. Neither was homophobia, but that is besides the point. You have said that "all" rape is equal, and so "all" types of rapes are included in the topic.
2. Exactly, the chil's body is not developed to have sex, so if they had sex in that way, it would hurt. Just like the anus is not developed to take penetration.
______________________________________
No, all rapes are as bad as one another, it's still the violent act of ruining someone's life and physically forcing them into a sexual act they dont want. When a woman is raped, there's a possibility that she gets pregnant, a guy cant get pregnant at all, but just because it was up his ass, doesn't make his rape worse than the woman's.
You have done nothing to support your point, you have only repeated yourself.
I am not saying rape is not bad, it is. I am saying there are worse forms of rape, like I explained.
Yes, it can ruin someone's life, but if a man is raped anally, he would have gone through a more painful experience due to being penetrated anally, which hurts more than being raped vaginally where the body part was designed to be penetrated. They would also have to deal with the social stigma of homosexuality, which does exist regardless of if it should exist or not. On top of all of this, he would have to also deal with the same thing female victims of rape would have to deal with, only with the added on parts women would not have to deal with by being raped by a man vaginally. So he has all of the normal elements of a rape victim plus the extended elements of being a victim under the reasons explained.
Again, you simply say "just because" and have no proof to back up your claim. If you are just going to keep stating that thinking that if you say it enough times with nothing to support the statement that I will change my mind, then you are mistaken.
If you really cannot understand that there is a difference between being penetrated in an area not designed for penetration and being penetrated in an area designed for penetration, then you are ignorant and clearly will not waver your opinion despite the facts displayed, which makes me question continuing this conversation.
Yes, a woman can become pregnant, but with so many birth control options "after" getting pregnant, it is not much of an issue. All she needs to do is get the morning after pill.
On a switch note, if a man is raped by a woman, he has no rights. That woman can have the child and the man can be forced to pay for the child that was made due to her raping him.
As a matter of fact, a fifteen year old that was raped by a woman has to pay child support now that he is an adult.
So this scenario, once again, harms men more, because they can actually have to "pay" their rapist because they were raped.
______________________________________
"Okay look, I never said all crimes are equally as bad, you're just assuming that. Of course a thief isnt as bad as a rapist or a murderer. It's stupid to think they are. Some people have to steal to survive but rape and murder are just evil acts people do because they can."
I never said you did, I was implying it is what your points imply.
That's going on to a different issue, so not addressing this one.
______________________________________
"Some people commit crimes just to get behind bars because in some countries prisoners get a better quality of life than those who dont have a big income of money.
Why does a rapist or murderer deserve a better quality of life than what they can get on the outside? That's just ridiculous."
"Some" do this, that doesn't mean that the rapist or murderer would. This actually depends on the prison. Most would not do this because of the risk of being in an environment with hardened criminals that most likely would be raping inmates aswell.
You are trying to condone murder for a lesser crime, which is what the above point was about, trying to have a harsher crime put on someone for a lesser crime.
If we were to comply with this, then we would have to comply with this happening with all aspects of crime.
______________________________________
"Rape is as bad as murder, in fact in ways, it's worse. Because the victim has to live with the mental scars and the after effects for their whole damn lives, people who get murdered, while tragic dont have to suffer that pain for years and even decades on end."
No, it's not. Murder takes away the chance to heal, takes away the chance to live again, rape does not. Yes, they have to live with what happened, but they also get the chance to overcome their victimization, murder victims do not.
Rape is not as bad as murder. As a rape victim myself, from a young age, I know what it's like to be raped, and I would rather be raped again than be murdered.
So you are telling me that being civil and not trying to fix a problem with murder is more barbaric than thinking "here is a problem. Kill it"? No, trust me, when it comes to civility, you lack it.
No, I love the current destruction of humanity. It fills me with delight to know that people are suffering all the time.
When Africans suffer, I don't like that though.
Rapists ruin many lives, awesome.
Don't know if I could kill anyone, but I'd definitely punch them in the face.
Yes. If it was legal, and it was confirmed with evidence he or she was a rapist, then yes.