Ask Your Question today
I'm writing this on November 4 2020, and I don't know who's going to win yet.
But if Donald Trump loses the election, will he give a concession speech as is customary?
Or will he leave office because he has to, never conceding?
| No, he will not give a concession speech. | 17 | |
| Yes, he will give a concession speech. | 9 |
Yeah, no shit. He actually...crazily...kookily...declared victory before the results were in. I feel like people should take notice when a powerful person displays obvious signs of a severe mental disorder, but that's expecting too much, obviously.
He said, when asked, "I think we won." Oh, yes. He's clearly deranged. *rolls eyes* Get real.
If he thinks there's been voter fraud he might not make a proper concession speech. It's not not Hillary was in a rush to concede to Trump four years ago.
he won't...he said that in the even he lost he won't be leaving peacfully(sore loser).
He will never admit his loss and will suit every last voter until he is dragged out by the secret service.
He'll do a "concession" speech, but in it I fully expect him to mention the supreme court/voter fraud and challenge the legitimacy of the result. He has a valid claim because in Wisconsin for example, there are more votes being counted than registered voters. It smacks of fraud and that isn't the only state which looks fishy.
What you say about Wisconsin is not true:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/04/tweets/no-wisconsin-doesnt-have-more-ballots-cast-registe/
It's beyond me why people persist in spreading such nonsense when anyone who's been on the internet for more than a month should immediately recognise the stench of social media BS, and it takes all of thirty seconds to fact-check it against credible sources.
I live in Wisconsin and I can tell you that there are more eligible people to vote than there were votes cast.
Please take a few moments to check what you think are facts.
Yeah when your state traditionally has a 60% turn out and then suddenly its 78% that's a weird happening. That should be investigated by both parties.
The Wisconsin 2020 Voter Turnout number is actually 72.3%; and the 78% number is from using incorrect and old numbers.
This is comparable to the 2004 election, although the previous 2 elections it was about 67%, and 70%. See link below:
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/05/donald-trump-jr/no-wisconsin-voter-turnout-did-not-jump-67-2016-89/
What about the weird happenings of how all five battle ground states major cities all have way less trump support than non battleground states? How is trump polling less in Milwaukee than chicago? I'm not even talking about leads here. I'm just saying that he is down by a considerably lower count in those particular cities vs all other cities. If he had the same turnout as last election he would of won these states. Tell me how that's possible for all 5 of those battle ground cities to have these defects when other major cities have the largely the same turnout as last election?
Suspicious ain't it?
My overview of things: 1st there are several ways to look at the candidates and political parties. As such some see Trump and the Republican party as the best answer; and others see Biden and the Democratic party as the best answer.
That is fine - and nothing wrong with it. The ability to have different viewpoints and peacefully and respectively disagree is one of the things that in my opinion truly makes America Great.
I'll be honest that I believe that we share different perspectives on what's important in a Political candidate (and I believe you have figured that out). I have no problem with that - again; its what makes things work: The ability to talk, learn about other points of view, and work to find a common mid-ground that allows us to move ahead (or at least that's how I believe it should work).
As for the election and the changes in polling numbers. I actually believe this has more to do with the effectiveness of new voter registration drives by the Democrats over what the Republicans did than anything else.
That is clearly the case in Georgia - where several Democratic Politicians led drives that added at least 800,000 people to the registered voter list - and got many of them to actually vote.
If you're concerned about this - I encourage you to become involved in a voter registration project that targets voters most likely to support your political viewpoint.
It's not over until it's over. Biases aside It is in Bidens best intrest to look at these voter fraud issues too. Yet when republicans want voter transparency they get shot down by democrats. Doesnt that seem very strange to do that? If the dems dont want to cooperate trump has a fair legal standing to win.