Why doesn't overpopulation get treated like a pivotal topic?

Tell that to the people who have lost their loved ones.

Change the subject, why don't you?

I'm a human supremacist; I believe humans are superior to every other creature in the universe. What's that mean? Means that I dont pay attention to race but I pay attention ideas. Some ideas are worse than others. It's the responsibility of the the superior ideas to overthrow the bad ones. Of course that has gone sour alot throughout history.

So far capitalism, free trading, and democracy have been the most effective way to elevate people above the poverty line and thus above starvation. Thus its imperative that capitalism must outlast other socioeconomic ideals purely on a humanitarian track record.

As for environmental damage, all I care for is the continuation of the human race rather than the population of whales. That doesnt mean I want to destroy the environment, infact I want to keep the world as green as possible. Making things more efficient is both better for the environment and long term better for profits. That being said natural selection tends to solve for a lot of problems, recently some bacteria have been seen eating what 30 years ago was completely unbiogradible plastic and breaking them down to their simpler forms (oil). If mother nature wasnt a fighter we would all be dead two centuries ago.

The poorer you are on average the more kids you have for some reason. That remains true for people in countries that have access to birth control. I dont think you can fix it with just birth control but I dont know everything maybe that would fix it. I dont think so tho. Maybe you'd have to fix the poverty also.

The common disease in Africa is corruption. The very people who propose agendas to dig the ordinary African people out of the poverty rut independent of support from developed countries, as their mandate to office, are the same people who cause misappropriate allocation of resources, (national and foreign aid (interestingly) alike). They steal and loot national capital to benefit.. not the common man, but their kin.

Even if they had farmers that country will fall apart when the whites leave and they will blame the demise on racism because white countries didnt give them sufficient handouts in economic relief. And they will also agree to the worst trade deals you can imagine and then blame other countries for exploiting them when they agreed to the stupid deal.

I contribute to society and don’t live off tax payer money

Well guess what? It does. Because not only do these motheefuckers fuck all the time, they don't use protection or fuck up somehow.

I’m not sure how often you talk to environmentalists or listen to them, but all of the ones I’ve heard from are already weighing the efficiency of pipelines, and they’re correctly coming to the conclusion that they’re not worth the risk. Every community that the pipeline goes through or near has the right to clean air, clean land, and clean water, and pipelines deny them of that right. You cannot deny people their constitution rights simply because it’ll save a multi billion dollar company a few bucks. If they want to continue living in the past and continue to use old, outdated technology that will no longer exist at some point in the future, if they want to continue doing long term damage to the environment and the planet, they should have to pay for it. We shouldn’t be making it easy for them. Especially since we already have more than enough pipelines already in place. Demand for fossil fuels isn’t going up, it’s going down and it’s going to continue decreasing exponentially faster every year. We’re going to be using less and less of it in the future, so we’re going to need to move less and less of it in the future. There’s no reason to build something that could be catastrophic to its surroundings when it’s not even going to be needed sooner rather than later.

I cant reproduce at all. Sad but that's why adoption exists.

Americans need to have at least 2.2 children per couple. The .2 means that in every 5 couples they have to have 3 kids to make up for the fact that not all people live to have children/ people not having kids at all.

That's baseline for keeping a stable population. Japan is somewhere around 1.3 so that means they REALLY need to have kids since japan is very ethnocentric. It's enough of a problem where you get paid by the goverment to have children. Not in the same way as welfare in america though.