Who's hotter overall?

28 Comments

These two are really attractive in their own ways. They are also two different people on the inside. While Kim likes the spotlight, Megan prefers to keep it lowkey. However, Megan sucks at what she does (acting) and Kim kills it at what she does (be herself/businesswoman). Megan comes off as a bitch and Kim comes off as a sweetheart. Idk how smart Megan is but I'm pretty sure she is a little more intellectual than Kim is. In terms of looks, Megan just has her breathtaking face and the rest is just a twig, boring. In contrast, Kim has the most wanted face plus has a real body and has been a good influence on most women all over the world to embrace their curves cause thats how women should look. If you look like a twig by genes, then thats okay but if you are dying to look like a twig or a scronny boy, thats when you should just go to sleep. Any other pros and cons about these women that support your decision, comment away.

Kim Kardashian	17
Megan Fox	39

Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!

[ Report Post ]

Comments ( 28 )

reminiscent

9 years ago

I dislike both of these people ...although nether of them are ugly and both have nice bodies...Megan has better eyes and I have a preference for eyes.
If I were a man or gay I wouldnt date ether as I dislike them both.
megan bad actress and she does seem bitch ...kim seems pretty stupid and does she even have a talent other then her ass??? Because beyonce has a great ass and talent...

Comment Hidden ( show )

3

3
- Anonymous Post Author
  
  9 years ago
  
  You're right. I totally forgot about Beyonce but see if I put her as an option, she'll automatically be the winner.
  
  Comment Hidden ( show )
  
  0
  
  0
  - reminiscent
    
    9 years ago
    
    Lol true
    
    Comment Hidden ( show )
    
    0
    
    0
MangoTango

9 years ago

Hmmmmm......they've both had some visits to the surgeons....I'll vote for Megan Fox because she's actually got an amusing personality. Kim? Useless beyond her looks,lol! Ok, can we answer this question of hotness for the male eye candy now? :-) My pick is Christian Bale. When he's prepped for a role, wow!

Comment Hidden ( show )

2

2
handsignals

9 years ago

Kim, all damn day.

Comment Hidden ( show )

2

2
[Old Memory]

9 years ago

Their beauty is way overrated. What one is more attractive?...Meh, I'll go with Megan Fox only on the basis that I'm not a fan of big boobs or big butts and she looks like she's in her late thirties in some pictures.

Comment Hidden ( show )

2

2
thegypsysailor

9 years ago

You are offering us a choice between two very ordinary looking women and calling them hot?
I wouldn't invite either one it into my bed.
Sorry, I don't think much of your taste in women.

Comment Hidden ( show )

2

2
- Anonymous Post Author
  
  9 years ago
  
  Lol well one, theyre brunettes and brunettes are a lot more exotic than blondes and not as ordinary looking as them. Blondes are more blah and boring. They all look the same lmao sorry X) plus I don't want to include like Oprah or the First Lady as they obviously make a huge impact on the world. I wanted to include "ordinary" personality girls that are more relatable. And two, they are perceived as two of the most beautiful women so thats why I decided to put them out there on top of the fact that I think so, too.
  
  Comment Hidden ( show )
  
  1
  
  1
  - kupokupo
    
    9 years ago
    
    "I wanted to include "ordinary" personality girls that are more relatable" - Kim Kardashian is ordinary and relatable? Seriously?
    
    Comment Hidden ( show )
    
    1
    
    1
  - TareBear20
    
    9 years ago
    
    I like blondes better. Blonde hair And blue eyes. ;)
    
    Comment Hidden ( show )
    
    0
    
    0
- flailyhailey
  
  9 years ago
  
  Neither of them are my "type", but I would definitely say they are above "ordinary". I'm curious - which celebrities would you rank as being "hottest"?
  
  Comment Hidden ( show )
  
  0
  
  0
  - thegypsysailor
    
    9 years ago
    
    I think Jordana Brewster is one of the most spectacular women I've ever seen. Missy Peregrym is also an extremely attractive gal, right off the top of my head. Both certainly have more talent in their little finger IMO, than either of the 2 gals in the pole.
    Neither have the talent of Nat Portman or Jodie Foster, but you seem to only be interested in the physical, right now.
    
    Comment Hidden ( show )
    
    0
    
    0
shuggy-chan

9 years ago

they both are hot... after i throw them in a trash incinerator

Comment Hidden ( show )

2

2
- Anonymous Post Author
  
  9 years ago
  
  Lol just choose one for the hell of it :p
  
  Comment Hidden ( show )
  
  0
  
  0
missy911

9 years ago

Megan Fox looked pretty rough when she first started being noticed and photographed. It really goes to prove that almost any woman can look gorgeous with the right clothes, shoes, jewelry, hair style, hair color, make-up, brow trim, brow tint, waxing, polishing, plucking, mani-pedi, hair extensions, lash extensions, spray-tan, cutlets, Wonder-bra, Spanx, skin bleaching, colon cleansing, sun-glasses, lighting & airbrushing. Sooo Simple. Kim was practically raised in this artificial standard and both Kim & Megan usually succeed at not looking unpleasant unless in a check-out counter celebrity rag.

You have to give credit to Megan Fox for getting where she has and honestly her acting isn't any worse than many A-list actors with better parts. She lacks experience and maybe doesn't have any true talent. She also doesn't have the Kardashian connections. Megan Fox by a mile.

Comment Hidden ( show )

1

1
_Cassandra_

9 years ago

Kim all the way. I have a majorrrr girl crush on her. What a body!!!!

Comment Hidden ( show )

1

1
kingofcarrotflowers

9 years ago

Megan keeps it low key? Really?

Comment Hidden ( show )

1

1
dynamohumm

9 years ago

Given a choice I'd have to say Megan rather than Kim. As far as I'm concerned Kim like the rest of the ubiquitous Kardashian's is a complete waste of space as far as looks, talent, contribution to the human race etc. Megan on the other hand is quite pretty and is not completely vacuous.

Comment Hidden ( show )

1

1
ilovetoiletrolls

9 years ago

I can't choose either because of their horrible personalities. One is dumb as rocks and the other is arrogant as anything.

Comment Hidden ( show )

1

1
- Anonymous Post Author
  
  9 years ago
  
  hahah thats funny but true! so what would you rather have around? arrogance but not dumb? or dumb but kind?
  
  Comment Hidden ( show )
  
  0
  
  0
  - ilovetoiletrolls
    
    9 years ago
    
    I would rather be alone if I had to choose lol.
    
    Comment Hidden ( show )
    
    3
    
    3
Nokiot9

9 years ago

Megan fox is the opitamy of human sex appeal. Sooooo perfect. Crystal eyes. Buxom lips like the Lilly and rose in a tussle and a gorgeous body to boot.

Comment Hidden ( show )

0

0
- pastor_of_muppets
  
  9 years ago
  
  Google Megan Fox acne scars
  
  Comment Hidden ( show )
  
  0
  
  0
Ean

9 years ago

Megan Fox looks better!!!!!!

Comment Hidden ( show )

0

0
KeddersPrincess

9 years ago

Megan Fox has a pretty face, Kim Kardashian does not, however, Kim has a nice shape.

Comment Hidden ( show )

0

0
RainbowDischarge

9 years ago

Megan Fox is an extremely hot cunty cunt who can't act for shit.

Comment Hidden ( show )

0

0
Shackleford96

9 years ago

I can't believe I got halfway into that paragraph before I actually realized who you were talking about.

Comment Hidden ( show )

0

0
WhiteStallion

9 years ago

Oh the agony!!!
Oh the shame!!!
I really can't say who's the lesser of the two evils but I can assure you my home girls put them to shame :P

Comment Hidden ( show )

0

0

Are You Normal?

Who's hotter overall?