Which is worse?

25 Comments

I read a news story about a hag who had a baby by going off her contraception behind its boyfriend's back.

http://uk.lifestyle.yahoo.com/immaculate-deception-i-don-t-regret-tricking-my-boyfriend-into-having-kids.html

I hate slut-shaming, but I believe this one deserves all the finger pointing it gets. The temptation to call it and any other hags stupid enough to have a baby through tricking their partner "sluts" and "whores" is almost overwhelming for me right now.

What's even worse is that nothing can be done because a poor innocent, cute little baby is never at fault!

Woman wanting a baby for revenge - he doesn't 9
Man wanting a baby for revenge - she doesn't 2
One wants a revenge baby and the other goes along with it 2
Both want a revenge baby 1
Deliberately trying to impregnate themselves with used condoms 4
Deliberately cutting holes in the condom 9
"Forgetting" to take contraception 2
Hiding your own/your partner's contraception 4
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 25 )
  • Mando
    11 years ago

    Wow - calling a woman an "it," "hag," "whore," "slut," - and "worse" nothing can be done to the baby (makes one shudder)!?!? - all over a tabloid article you read - you're quite a disturbed and misogynistic little creep!

    Get help.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    5
    5
      -
    • Anonymous Post Author
      11 years ago

      I also know a girl in my year at school who was stupid enough to do the same thing.

      I'd also like to point out that I am - unfortunately - female.

      What COULD have been done was that the hag aborted the child as soon as it knew how it was determined to ruin its partners' life.

      However, the child has now been born and will be burdened with having a hag for a mother and may well hate it for being so selfish. Genuinely loving mothers would have children because BOTH PARTNERS WANTED TO.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • Mando
        11 years ago

        Your gender is irrelevant to your vicious misogyny and misopedia - though I thought you were just ItDuz. I still think that.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        3
        3
          -
        • VioletTrees
          11 years ago

          I love how they think that "I am -unfortunately- female" is proof that they're not misogynistic.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          1
          1
            -
          • Mando
            11 years ago

            Right on.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
            0
            0
        • BlueAlice
          11 years ago

          Welp, ItDuz is here now.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
        • Anonymous Post Author
          11 years ago

          Well... I'm not.

          Also, I'm well aware that I'm misogynistic sometimes. If women weren't as stupid as to do *splutters and gestures above* ; reduce themselves to only living for the attention of the opposite sex or dumb themselves down to be "cute" .... then I wouldn't feel the need to be like that.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
            -
          • Mando
            11 years ago

            I understand your point but going over the top about it kind of makes your hyperbole the issue. I do that too so that's on good authority as a complete expert at losing it!

            Comment Hidden ( show )
            0
            0
    • [Old Memory]
      11 years ago

      So you think it's misogynistic for someone to be emotional about how women are allowed to trick men in to parenthood?

      Piss off.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      -4
      -4
        -
      • VioletTrees
        11 years ago

        Maybe you should read things before you reply to them. It's not misogynistic to criticise individual women, necessarily, but if you call a woman a whore or a slut to do it, that's misogynistic.

        This case is questionable at best, because everybody involved should be informed about the risks when having sex, including the possibility of pregnancy. What one woman does isn't a reflection on all women, though, and connecting her shitty decision making to her womanhood is sexist. You don't get to make every mistake that individual women make a reflection on women as a whole.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        2
        2
          -
        • Mando
          11 years ago

          Exactly.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
  • VioletTrees
    11 years ago

    If you're tempted to call women sluts and whores every time they do something shitty, that's still sexism. It's applying gender slurs the minute a woman does something wrong. Say "this woman is a shitty person", not "this woman is a slut".

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    1
    1
      -
    • Anonymous Post Author
      11 years ago

      I'm only tempted to use those names on those who think it's OK to have babies out of revenge or to deceive their partners on purpose in order to get pregnant.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • VioletTrees
        11 years ago

        Yes, but using those names is still wrong. It's not ok to use slurs on anybody.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        1
        1
          -
        • Anonymous Post Author
          11 years ago

          It's not OK, I guess... doesn't stop some people, though!

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
  • Mando
    11 years ago

    I understand your point but going over the top about it kind of makes your hyperbole the issue. I do that too so that's on good authority as a complete expert at losing it!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
  • Corleone
    11 years ago

    It's all sick. I feel terrible about the baby. The kid will have to grow up with shitty parents that don't love each other.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
      -
    • VioletTrees
      11 years ago

      Did you read the article? The parents do love each other. They're glad they had the baby.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • Corleone
        11 years ago

        Really? I just went by what the guy said. I didn't read the article

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        0
        0
          -
        • VioletTrees
          11 years ago

          Yeah. Look at the actual article. The man wanted a kid, but wasn't able to discuss it because he was freaked out about commitment. The woman took a risk by going off birth control without telling him, and it could've turned out horribly if she'd been wrong about him wanting children, but she was right.

          You could certainly argue that she shouldn't have taken control without his consent like that, but in this case, it did work out.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
  • myboyfriendsbitch
    11 years ago

    weird.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
      -
    • Anonymous Post Author
      11 years ago

      Indeed that hag is!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • myboyfriendsbitch
        11 years ago

        Yeah, she's weird too. 40 year old women shouldn't try to have children at all.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        -1
        -1
  • [Old Memory]
    11 years ago

    It should be against the law for a woman to trick a man in to parenthood.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    -1
    -1
      -
    • VioletTrees
      11 years ago

      I sort of agree, actually. It wouldn't have mattered in this case, though, because the man was glad she was pregnant, so I doubt he would've pressed charges.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0