What would you do in this situation?

If a stranger, or someone you know, ACCIDENTALLY injured you, and you were NOT seriously harmed:
Would you sue them for financial compensation, even if they gave a meaningful apology?

Yes, I would sue them, even if I know them. 9
Yes, but only if I don't know them personally. 5
I don't know. 6
No, but I would if they didn't appologize. 12
No, they were sorry and I'm alright. 42
No, I think sueing people, when no real harm's done, is wrong. 54
Other. (explain below) 3
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 20 )
  • tugchug

    Law Suits are the New American Way these days. Friendship can and will change at the drop of a hat

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • When I was younger my friend hit me in the hip with a golf club. It hurt for a few days.. but I was fine. Sueing her wouldve been just wrong. It was only an accident.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • sumrandomguy

    insurance salesman here... when you sue you dont sue the actual person u are usually sueing the ins company that covers them. Whether or not you think it's morally correct if you get hospital time u r going to be down a pretty penny. think of this a medivac helli charges starts at $40,000, so lets see u morally correct non sue ppl deal w/ that.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • pixie_dust

    in most cases I wouldnt just bcuz im not a money hungry bitch. however, if the person was a total jerk that had plenty of money but stole from people less fortunate, or some other similar, serious character flaw, in rare instances its be possible, but unlikely overall.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • joybird

    Absolutely not!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • jamesmitchell29486

    I'd injure them back.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Me too. Then you're even.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • IAmTheCynic

    Australians are too laid back to sue people. It just takes a "Sorry mate" and a "No worries" and we're all good.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • dappled

      An Australian mate of mine says "No wuckers". When he explained that this means "no wucking furries", I instantly understood Aussies.

      Good people. I like!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • webs

    It would depend on who it was. Only if it were someone that I didn't like too much, then I would sue them. But if were a random person, I wouldn't care.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • I would get the police involved. Why? This person may have DUIs. Additionally, I would pursue litigation if they did have DUIs and were drunk when they hit me. I might win. I might not. But, I wouldn't feel good about not protesting this person driving around if they hit someone again and seriously injured them or killed them.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • This poll is for ANY accident, not just car accident. Just an example: What if you were leaving a restaurant and tripped on a loose paver; you banged your knee a bit, but nothing serious or long term?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dappled

    I'd never sue for anything. I just accept that bad things happen sometimes. I don't need paying for them.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • wigsplitz

      Oh, good to know. So can I borrow $10,000 and your car, kind sir. I PROMISE to return it....

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • dappled

        Good luck with that. I'm broke and I've never driven a car. :)

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • wigsplitz

          Wow, never? Holy shit!!

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • His part of england is still ruled by the romans and their principal mode of transportation is oxen.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • I find it pathetic. It would depend on my mood but if I wasnt seriously injured I wouldnt do anything maybe tell them to watch what they are doing.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • wigsplitz

    Well in order to sue someone for something like that you'd have to have suffered a loss-medical bills, lost work, a physical disfigurement and/or loss of function and so on.

    I personally wouldn't run to a doctor unless I was in serious pain or needed stitches or something and even then I doubt I'd sue someone, I guess it would depend more on if I was going to lose function or have some kind of continuous problem or a horrible scar or something.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • True. However, for just about any type of accident, you can claim you have back or neck pain, which is impossible to disprove.

      Like I wrote in the poll question: "you were NOT seriously harmed".

      Of course no one would fault you for suing if you were seriously injured, but that's not what this poll is about.

      Comment Hidden ( show )