What the whaa?

Yeah, maybe. I think you're meeting him way more than half way, though.

This user's posts are often very poorly worded and borderline incomprehensible. But he stands upon his own capacity to communicate outward, his cogent arguments, and the inability of others to comprehend like a platform for that "brutal honesty."

In truth I think most people are being PC with him just because they don't want to be brutally honest. Plus, as the old saying goes: "you can't argue with a fool."

At any rate, he had his Diva moment and "left" the community. Shouldn't be hard to see when he eventually returns...

I don't think criticism is rude if it's a valid point. OP was trying to talk about debate/communication, and in particular how it has gone downhill, but his writing style is perfect example of how not to communicate.

Now, if I said he was a stupid fuck with his head up his ass, that would be rude...but just to be clear...I didn't say that...

Your post shows your lack of deductive reasoning and unjust reasons for your reasoning, making your point refuted because the opposition refuted the reasoning that you origininally refuted as being unjust.

Using logic I can point out my point that he cannot use two sentences because he has made his own different writing standard and style that differentiates from other writing standards in that it's different in that aspect, making his writing standard his own that he made for himself as a completely different way of writing than that. He obviously can't deviate from the standard he set for himself as deviating from the different differentials of the different standard makes the whole standard aspect fall apart and the different aspect becomes less different and before you know it all of the aspects of reasoning become one big analogy for irony, ironically.

Be warned, I am highly skilled in debating and I will crush you in debate if you reply and try to debate the refuted points by debating me.