Dictatorship is better in many ways but the major issue with the system is eventually you get a bad dictator. If the dictator is a good leader its better because he doesnt have so much bureaucracy to deal with and can do the things that need to be done. The major problem with democracy is everyone gets a vote. If you go down the street and ask people basic questions about politics and the world they cant answer them. But most of them still vote. These people can easily be lead by fear and emotion. But dictatorship is more dangerous because like I said, eventually you get a bad one.
What's better? A dysfunctional democracy or a functional dictatorship?
← View full post
Dictatorship is better in many ways but the major issue with the system is eventually you get a bad dictator. If the dictator is a good leader its better because he doesnt have so much bureaucracy to deal with and can do the things that need to be done. The major problem with democracy is everyone gets a vote. If you go down the street and ask people basic questions about politics and the world they cant answer them. But most of them still vote. These people can easily be lead by fear and emotion. But dictatorship is more dangerous because like I said, eventually you get a bad one.