What morality would you select?
Would you select Wittgenstein? Selfishness, selflessness, philanthropy? I'd select philanthropy, pluralistic deontology, Wittgenstein, and quantitative hedonism.
Ask Your Question today
Would you select Wittgenstein? Selfishness, selflessness, philanthropy? I'd select philanthropy, pluralistic deontology, Wittgenstein, and quantitative hedonism.
Please refrain from using eins, esses, opys, ics, itys, ologies and isms. Thank you.
I think dirtybirdy said it best, however I choose the option of NOT being a pretentious wanker.
Ignore this idiot (who I am pretty sure is a guy) as they have nothing better to do than attack other users because they think it makes them look witty, when they are anything but.
yall been round years and is onea the most levelheaded mofos here
this fools fulla shit
My compass says moral superiority is achieved by owning the world. This is done by incentivizing others to produce wealth. Riches are destiny.
Have you read Wittgenstein's paper on ethics? It doesn't seem consistent with a deontological perspective or hedonistic perspective. (Or any theory of morality for that matter).
I just vomited. Write things that make sense next time because your post makes me sick.
I don't believe in labels. I believe they divide people. We should just be able to believe in what we want to without being pressured and judged. I know this isn't the case with all beliefs but I do think it is a significant problem.
I'll be upfront and say that I did not understand most of the terms used outside of the second sentence, and that I'm also too lazy to look them up due to the title of the thread.
I have my own morality system. It's a pretty simple "don't hurt people or animals" system with nuances and exceptions based on the situation, combined with "don't be mean". It doesn't automatically include philanthropy, but since I often feel like a dick if I don't participate in some of it, I do it anyway.
I think morality is a question that should be asked about in terms of specific topics, not just in general.