Was zimmerman justified?
So I'm sure a majority of Americans have heard this story, but I'll recap: a man, Zimmerman, followed a 17-year-old boy, Martin, as he was walking through a gated community. He was wearing a black hoody, carrying skittles. Zimmerman was a volunteer with, but not a member of, the neighborhood watch. He was carrying a pistol, & was in a car. At some point he ended up on foot following Martin, on the phone w/ 911 (you can find clips online.)
Now, Martin's father lived in the community, but Martin usually stayed with his mother. There had also been some break-ins, which is why Zimmerman was following him. The dispatcher told Zimmerman that police were on their way, & he didn't have to follow the boy.
At this point is the mystery. According to Zimmerman, he was getting into his car when Martin punched him, & started beating him. Then as Martin gave him a moment, Zimmerman shot him.
However, the bullet wound was in Martin's back. Also, video of Zimmerman shows him walking into a police station under his own power. Furthermore, why would Zimmerman let Martin, of whom he was obviously suspicious, come so close? Plus, he had been warned not to carry while on watch, AND gun safety would tell you to always maintain enough distance. So if Martin approached him, should he not identify himself as neighborhood watch, and that he was armed?
Please, share your opinions & additional information (valid, confirmable info, not conjectures please.) I'm curious as to the general public's view.
| Zimmerman was irresponsible & stupid but was justified to shoot. | 10 | |
| Zimmerman instigated the situation. He should be charged. | 10 | |
| Zimmerman should be arrested for manslaughter. | 8 | |
| Zimmerman should be arrested for murder. | 16 | |
| It was justified, Zimmerman is totally in the right. | 10 |