The extermination of certain groups for the sake of humanity.

(Translator)

"I am not bothered by your remark but now I am going to explain myself to you because I am bothered by your remark"

I figured that. Believe it or not, people are able to read your hidden genius.

I was not calling you a Nazi, I was pointing out that this has been done before, and look what happened.

My point is, who decides? Those in power? Who are they to decide who should die? I agree, the world would be better without child molesters, rapists, murderers, etc. But I don't think in practice, this is a good idea. As Hitler proved.

I think we should get rid of bullys like the ones who gang up on one kid to beat the shit out of them, Racist Weebos for sure, Rapist(not all sex offender since pissing outside could be a sex offence since someone caught you), those who rape children, Also what counts as animal abuse? for the sake of this, Human traffickers.

We can not destroy people who do not believe in life in other planets since we have yet been proven. So its still up for debate. Also if someone does not believe in life in other planets well so be it they have no evidence its just an opinion.

Drug dealers while drugs should not be legal I find killing a dealer kind of harsh. They sold something illegally but the client chooses to buy. Thats the clients fault not the dealer. Murder is sometimes justified if its for self defense so I would not say that either.

People with a low intelligence you would be including mentally retarded people. Those people do not choose to be retarded so it would be cruel to kill them. In fact retardation is put on a scale. If you are under an amount of IQ points you are retarded.

Racists if they are not committing hate crimes I would say keep them. Yes racism is annoying and probobly very depressing but unless its extreme racism I would not say to get rid of them. Besides that means any slightly racist joke would get you killed.

Killing someone with health issues is very cruel. As they might have been born with it. That would also defeat the purpose of doctors. So that means you also want to get rid of all doctors. Given how shitty the world economys have been getting I don't think that is a very good idea.

Simply rejecting science does not mean science does not exist. So weather or not someone chooses to believe in it is simply an opinion. As well as that science is really just guess work. Why we experiment to see what the results may be. An untestable idea is just a theory.

You really cant argue over something neither side has any real evidence to support. So what life might be hiding somewhere in the galaxy is still a mystery though they have not found must in any of the ones we have searched.

"relatively few people have had fantasies of rape but more people have had (fleeting) fantasies about murdering someone"

Not so, given that the number of rapists is epidemic in comparison to murderers. And also due to the fact that people don't tend to admit rape fantasies lol. There's no way in hell to tell for sure, you'd never get the truth.

I don't think having fantasies about murder somehow makes it less negative than ones that are not frequently fantasized.

The definition of murder, however, mentions it to be "premeditated", not a "mistake", which is manslaughter, I believe.

I understand your position, and if you feel like I am attacking you (as you may be aware they way I respond tends to seem aggressive even if not intended), then be assured that is not my intent and I am not responding to you as if you personally hold these beliefs.

I was raped when I was a child, so I don't buy that. Yes, it can destroy someones life, however it gives you time to recover. It doesn't destroy your life if you don't let it, and you have that chance of a life again, where as murder doesn't, that's it, it's over. No second chances, you don't get to recover.

Are you telling me that you would rather be murdered than raped? One is absolute, there is no recovery, the other can give recovery.

I think the "It ruins someone's life" is taking it too far, I really do. Yes, rape is horrible, anyone that does it should be punished, it is a horrendous crime, however people that were raped, atleast from the people I have known, are not stuck in the corner curled up for the rest or their lives or always sad, most of them have actually went on to overcome their victim status. I don't buy in to the cliche that rape victim's lives are absolutely destroyed, as if it overcomes all aspects of their lives, that they can no longer be happy, I find that idea to be ridiculous, however murder doesn't give the person the chance to be happy again.

To kill a murderer is not the same as to kill an innocent, it is not hypocritical, perhaps unethical, but then again if murdering a murderer is bad, then killing a rapist would be even worse, as explained above why.

Simply being alive after a negative is not enough to say "it's worse" that murder. Like someone that perhaps is in a wheelchair or have an arm missing, or perhaps are deaf, these are things they have to live with, would you kill yourself simply because you have to live with that, or would you know that those areas do not triumph over every other aspect of your life?

What makes our reason for killing them better than theirs for killing others? Well, honestly, I thought it would be a no-brainer, no offense intended, but I will ask you a question that answers yours:
What justifies our reason for killing a rapist?

The world would be better off if we changed it so that those kinds of people weren't created to begin with you nazi filth bag of shit.

These people are made by society and/or terrible parenting.

Terrorists kill themselves Hopscotch.

Yes, my morality may be naive. Yet an absolutist rejection of killing is what protects the innocent. If we say it should be accepted to kill people in some cases then everything gets blurry. Who desides who deserfes to die? Who desides who's guilty? If there's no godlike unfailing authority this system will create more killing of people who did not deserve it.

I like having my infantile idealism. For it also protects me from changing my morality according to what might be most comfortable in my current situation.

Who decides ANYTHING?

It's simple: might makes right.