Spank your kids or have spoiled brats?
What would you prefer? Physical abuse over children that's not entirely abuse, or having spoiled brats for kids?
I don't care if my kid is spoiled! I wont hurt it! | 42 | |
Spank them! | 144 |
Ask Your Question today
What would you prefer? Physical abuse over children that's not entirely abuse, or having spoiled brats for kids?
I don't care if my kid is spoiled! I wont hurt it! | 42 | |
Spank them! | 144 |
This is a terrible poll. If I have children, which I won't, I wouldn't hit them unless necessary. I'd lecture them or some shit.
Unless they tell me to fuck off. They're getting ass kicked.
Why make a poll if you're just going to make it completely biased? You're destroying the whole point of having a poll in the first place.
Coming from someone who was abused as a child, I would certainly never put my own children through that. I don't have any kids, but if I ever do, then I will teach them to behave WITHOUT hitting them.
I'd just like to ask one question. How would you feel if someone that was 3 meters tall and weighing three times you weight started to get really pissed at you then picked you up like a rag doll and beat you. You have no means of defending yourself at all. That's what it feels like from a child's point of view. I call anyone who beats their child a coward. There are always other ways to make children learn. I remember a teacher once telling us about a kid who got a beating from his mom because he had hit another kid. Where is the sense in that? You get a beating to teach you not to hit someone else. Where's the logic in that?
Beating is not the same as spanking or hurting your kid for the purpose of raising it well. Beating a kid because you're pissed off at it is actually a way of reliving stress. It's wrong. You dont kick your dog each time you're angry. Same goes with kids...
I know there are other ways of teaching kids, but this poll is biased for a reason: IF nothing else worked, would you hit your kid?
They're just different words for physicval aggression in my book. If nothing else worked, I wouldn't hit my kid because as I said earlier it's cowardice. You wouldn't want a beating from someone twice your size, twice your weight and three times your strength, so why would any child like it? I agree with Dad, it just teaches children to fear their parents.
You can always discipline them. Spanking them isn't going to improve anything. They won't be spoiled brats if you know how to raise them.
everyones says theyll never spank their kids untill they actually have them lol theirs a fine line between spanking and abusing. /i beleive you should use spanking as a last resort after you've tried everything else. but yes i do believe a kid needs a good spanking every once in a while. back in the day everyone spanked, and now everyones too scared to whip their kids because of cps and what not, and people wonder whats wrong with kids these days. Their just not disiplined enough. like the bible says...spare the rod, spoil the child.
What a horrible poll! There are other ways to discipline, you know. Children who are spanked are being taught that violence is the way to teach lessons, and that's simply not true.
I won't hurt 'it'?
It saddens me that you would though.
Seems the only 'learning' with a child being spanked is how to fear your parents (great going there) and ultimately to physically hit out at other people when you think they're wrong!
IT don't work.
I choose choice 3. Therefore I didn't vote.
I was physically hurt and I dont fear my parents. Most kids dont too.
Its a matter of how you do it rather than to do it or not.
The poll is biased for a reason.
When I was a kid I never got spanked.
I got hit in the face/stomach or slapped across the cheek instead.
I fully agree with you that it's just a way to get your kid to fear you, I never feared them though. A few months ago I brought it up and told them how their actions had made me resent them.
I do love them but I have in a way always hated them.
You pull down the underwhere and grab a belt, padle and hit there ass with i do it until they have a red ass and marks all other it and wait till they cry
I have 3 kids just the 4 year old needs it
I was spanked as a child, and I didn't turn out with any problems. Time out never worked for me either. Infact, I liked time out. I was always a creative kid, so time out just gave me time to myself where I could think. A lot of people wanna say that spanking your kids is bad, and that there is a different alternative, but I would say, all kids are different. The punishment depends upon the child and what works best for them. A good parent should know there own child and know if spankings work or if it's best for them to have time out. Some kids don't even need either but simply hate the fact that they dissapointed their parents. Anyways, it all boils down to the kid.
I'm going to take this poll literally here, because I doubt your looking for a speech about how there are better methods of punishment than spanking, you were looking for an A or B answer. I'm going to assume this is true and only give you an answer and an explanation, not a speech about the fact that being a spoiled brat is not the worst thing a child can be.
If I had to choose, between spanking my kids and having spoiled brats, I'd choose spanking my kids, assuming it will help them become productive members of society.
Hmm. That's so black and white!
I've never hit my sons, and I never would. I prefer to talk to them and help them understand what they did wrong, maybe discuss it a bit. Whereas my husband, on the other hand, adopts a 'Ned Flanders' angle to parenting!
Think on't.
Spank. There is absolutely a difference between abuse and discipline, even though a lot of so-called "breeders" (and there's a difference between breeders and parents!) would say otherwise.
You can give a light tap on the butt without bruising. You just tell the child WHY they are getting a swat, give them a swat, and be done with it quickly so you and child can both move on!
How about swatted? It startles them when they don't expect it. Mine got the hint. I never really spanked. Just swatted.
Spank them.
I acknowledge that there are other ways to discipline a child, but for me, I'll probably spank them in addition to taking things away.
I was a very well treated child, with very set in stone rules. My parents were not strict, but when I did break one of the rules in place, I knew exactly what my punishment was going to be. A spanking.
Guess how many times my parents had to spank me before I learned to stay on the right side of the line? Three (I have always been a bit daft) But after the third time they didn't have to spank me.
My children will be disciplined, but not abused. There is a difference in the two. Anybody that doesn't see the difference either grew up in a non spanking house hold, or grew up in an abusive household. (to the latter I am very sorry)
My mom used to put a spoonful of pepper in my mouth. That sucked. I'd probably do that. It made me the amazing person I am today.
Spank the brats! there's nothing wrong in corporal punishment. At least kids knew manners when you hit them.
I gave my son hidings when he needed them, and he has turned out to be the best kid around. I also got hidings and there is nothing wrong with me
My Mom spanked me, it didn't hurt me and I find your second option to provide a false dichotomy. There is a third option: Spank your child, as my mother did, as a means of discipline, not an outlet for anger. I am a perfectly well adjusted human being, I sure as hell deserved to get my ass smacked when I was being pert, and if more people still spanked their kids we wouldn't have so many bastards running around wreaking havoc.
well spanking is sort of by definition the act of causing physicall pain on a kid's behind as a mean of discipline. Beating a kid would be abuse and an outlet of anger. I get your point though. I should've been more precise.
Not really, giving a kid a swipe on the ass is a lot different than balling up your fist and giving them a beat down. The difference is in the intent and in the way the discipline is carried out. I was also hit by adults that were not my parents and that was abuse, but I knew the difference back then just as I knew today.
NOTE TO ALL COMPLAINING
The poll IS MEANT to be black and white with no ''OTHER'' as option. I want to see what would you people prefer if no other method worked.
The thing is, people can't take the poll seriously, and therefore it will not render serious results. The previously stated "If nothing else worked but physical violence, would you do it or not?" makes this question into a strict hypothetical, because this isn't the black and white issue you are posing it to be. Hypothetical questions will only garner flawed answers (as well as deserved criticism), mainly because the question and premise itself is flawed.
If you think about it you don't do it hard its the shock to the child that sort of does it...You were probably Given a lil tap on the hand ur rear