Should nazi sympathizers be killed?

Should they be killed whether it'd be death penalty sort of like how William Joyce was killed and etc etc. or should they not be killed?

Yes 8
No 29
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 54 )
  • Rumpelforeskin

    No. There are no buts with free speech. Free speech means defending the right to say things you don't necessarily agree with.

    "If you're really in favor of free speech, then you're in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you're not in favor of free speech." -Noam Chomsky

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Meowypowers

      That is so perfect

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • KholatKhult

      There are many buts with American protected Free Speech. Unlimited Free Speech would be a disaster.

      “ Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising. Defamation that causes harm to reputation is a tort and also an exception to free speech. “ this is for the United States Constitution.

      Nazi sentiment violates a lot of this, so do some Communist and Anarchist and other Fascist ideas, so I do not think promotion of Nazi ideas is protected, not by foreign American rights anyway

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • MonteMetcalfe

        Hey man I like obscenity. A guy's gotta have a hobby.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • KholatKhult

          And I like speech that incites imminent lawless action ! We are equally oppressed now

          Comment Hidden ( show )
      • Rumpelforeskin

        Yes obviously things that directly violate other peoples rights are illegal but beyond directing violating other peoples rights freedom of speech should have no buts. The ONLY reason a government wouldn't give it's citizens free speech is because they want to do shady crap without the citizens being able to call them out on it. Freedom of speech is THE most important right without it you end up with a tyrannical government that arrests people over memes like Scotland.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Clunk42

          That is not the only reason. For example, the reason Catholicism condemns the concept of free speech is that it allows modernism, other heresies, and apostasy to flourish, damning hundreds of thousands of souls. We can see this is certainly true in America.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • LloydAsher

            America isnt a catholic country. Never was, it was mostly protestants.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Clunk42

              Yes. I recognize that. It does not change my point, though. The lack of Catholic censorship has allowed all kinds of errors to flourish in America.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • DADNSCAL

    No one should be killed for their beliefs. That’s what Nazis do. But they should be held accountable if they break the law and harm others.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • LloydAsher

    We would become nazis in another way if we perpetrated that.

    The only nazi I wanna be is a grammar nazi.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • 1WeirdGuy

    No because the word Nazi is thrown around too lightly these days. I assume alot of non Nazis would be killed. Also you'd have to take out half of Ukraines military.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      They represent less than a percent in voting power.

      Shouldnt be throwing stones in this regard since the left is saying the exact same thing.

      Let stupid people have their beliefs. If they arent perpetrating a genocide they can do whatever in their little gay club of Anglo saxons.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • 1WeirdGuy

        Even the infantry that aren't in the azov battalion have nazi views many of them wear nazi symbols on their uniform. The azov battalion is a nazi unit that is now part of the ukrainian national guard and funded by the USA. They have been known to burn people alive on video and blah blah blah whatever theyre dicks. They persecute Russian speaking people. Im not simping for russians either theyre also retarded meat heads but we arent giving them 50 billion every few months so I dont care about them. Russia is gonna win this war we are burning that money and giving it to nazis. Not even a nato country. Shit pisses me off. We have no obligation to protect them. Im drunk, its my birthday.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • LloydAsher

          It's a complex political conundrum we are in. At the end of the day, I like what hand we were given tactically. We have allies that have far more motivation to kill their enemies than the Afghans people.

          Slaughtering our enemies on mass, weakening them in the long run at only a couple billion dollars and zero american lives?

          Sounds like a bargain price for what they are accomplishing. I'm not supporting biden in his "role" I'm supporting the apt solution towards russian aggression.

          Neo nazis and stalin style russians killing themselves? For only monetary costs? Hell of a bargain to reduce the numbers of players on the chessboard. Once they are off, china is next. Dont need a two front war and the nazis are taking notice that china didnt exactly say no to russia when they were being invaded.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • 1WeirdGuy

            See I agree with you on China. We should have thousands of troops in Taiwan. But in regards to Ukraine I feel like you need to quit watching so much Fox news. FUCK the Ukraine bro. Its the most corrupt country in Europe. And they are not even our allies. They have only been a country for 30 years and its been a shitshow the entire time. You dont understand that we are playing with fire here. We could actually start WW3 over a shit hole non ally country where half the people want to join back with russia. Inflation going up even more because of our decision to quit buying russian gas. Something no other European country did but us. Theyre all still buying russian gas and oil but as always USA sacrifices its economy for others, even non allies. Even for a shithole country.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • LloydAsher

              Gas prices? That's a biden problem 100%. We had no 1 oil production in the world. The fuck did that go? The oil sure as hell is still there.

              Sure ukraine is corrupt... and? Not saying its optimal that they are corrupt. Its just that they are useful for killing russians. Something that we cant do without triggering ww3. Russia is flinging the word nukes around as much as they are flying the word nazis. So far I see no practical reason why Putin would do so. If they nuked Ukraine there would be 2 different outcomes and neither of them include nuke usage on our side because nukes arent the most powerful weapon. Economics and political power. Russia takes the plunge, any country that was neutral on this matter either has to side 100% on the sanctions or risk being sanctioned themselves. And/or nato fully invades ukraine kicking russias asses out but not invading Russia and sending them decades behind the world economy. Cant build modern tanks without modern resources and capital, something that Russia cannot do, they couldnt pull it off in the Soviet era and they cant do it in the modern age.

              China would be forced to sanction their ally to not be sanctioned and have hundreds of thousands of starving peasants. China might be corrupt as all hell but 3 missed meals is all it will take to stand in front of a tank again.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Ihidabody

    No. They have an opinion that most people claim to disagree. So what?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • raisinbran

    You mean instead of giving them 40 billion?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • PurpleHoneycomb

    No. If they're a genuine neo-nazi they should be publicly shunned but not killed. No one should be killed until they ultimately take a life themselves.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • 1WeirdGuy

      Theyre good qt doing that themselves. All the nazi guys get the swastika tattoos. The only nazis that exist are in federal prison or california prisons.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • KholatKhult

      By shunned do you mean censored and deplatformed ?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • PurpleHoneycomb

        I simply mean ignored. At most I mean to tell the person they are indeed an asshole and to (kindly) explain why they are one.

        However, if the person is doing things go against the terms of service of a platform then the company is well within their right to remove you from said service.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • KholatKhult

          That hasn’t been working well

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • PurpleHoneycomb

            Yeah, that's an unfortunate truth. I'm an idealist though; for better and for worse. There's a part of me that doesn't think there is a benevolent solution to the issue and it deeply saddens me.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
      • LloydAsher

        I mean that's the point of 4chan?

        4chan is the line between what's considered legal.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • KholatKhult

          Working on your own manifesto Lloyd ?

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • LloydAsher

            I perfer to call it my magnum opus.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • KholatKhult

              Uh huh. Right. Then I pray Lady Liberty protects Americans from your radicalized hatred.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • kqjlsxdtq7393

    No.
    I believe most bad people are raised and taught to be bad or filled with hate.
    I was raised and taught to be homophobic but I didn't listen. I'm bi and have many lgbt and non lgbt friends.

    No one deserves death penalty. Maybe just the worse pain but not death.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Tommythecaty

    But then you’d essentially be a Nazi and would have to kill yourselves immediately afterwards 🤣

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • RoseIsabella

    What are you going to do, build a time machine, and plot to kill the Duke, and Dutchess of Windsor?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

      remember that song 'duke of earl'?

      i call the dingo duke of squirrel

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • RoseIsabella

        That's awesome! It's a good pun.

        *note*: RoseIsabella does not support, or endorse any harm coming to squirrels.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

          he dont catch em he just likes observin and chasin em

          hes a shitty hunter hes too loud & excitable

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • RoseIsabella

            That's what I like to hear.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Orphan

    It could just be fantasy. Doesn't mean they actually hate jews, gays, etc. For those who actually hate them it might be dangerous and they should be locked up for life

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • LloydAsher

      Those who hate usually have an inferiority complex and project those feelings of hatred towards that particular group.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • idkyourmom27

    No cuz than u'd haf ta kill m3 dawg :3

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Wow3986

    No, murder is wrong, but people that sympathize with those scumbags need to be locked up ASAP.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • bigbudchonger

    Agreed

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • KholatKhult

    lol.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Tinybird

    yeah cause that makes you so much better.... /s

    Comment Hidden ( show )