Open ended questions. no voting.

TheManagement here. Could use your opinion on something.

Right now there are two types of questions on the site:

1) Classic "is it normal?" questions that get yes/no voting

2) Polls that having voting on arbitrary options.

I'm thinking of adding a new posting option:

3) Open ended questions with no voting at all. Just a post on top and comments below.

I'm still not totally sure what this might be used for though.

What kinds of questions would you use this for? What do you think?

Thanks!

I'd love that. 29
Bad idea. 7
Interesting. 34
I've been waiting for this my whole life. 9
I'm wary of this. 3
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 27 )
  • q25t

    Personally, I'd like it. I kind of worry when making a poll that I'm influencing what people think just by the options that I put down. Without those options, people would be less likely to be influenced by what I think and hopefully give a more honest opinion.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • disthing

    I'm not sure. Could It somewhat dilute the purpose of the website?

    The question 'Is it normal?' is the main reason we're here, or at least it's the first motivation behind our visit. Once you start introducing open ended questions it might become like Yahoo Answers or similar.

    Perhaps it could work. I'm just wary of it being used as some personal blog by people - ranting on about their personal lives forgetting the point of the site.

    I actually like the constraints on each question and poll at the moment - I think it encourages people to consider what it is they're actually asking and why. But I can see how it might work alongside the existing options :)

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • TheManagement
      STAFF

      Yes, this is my fear as well. Exactly.

      However, I get a lot of posts that are otherwise interesting and more-or-less on topic that I have to reject because they aren't asking the right questions in the right way or didn't bother putting a few dummy poll choices. I suppose it could be limited to an internal decision by the moderators to "remove voting" from a good post that doesn't really need it.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • disthing

        Or include the option to 'remove voting' when somebody is submitting an IIN question, then the moderators upon moderating can decide if the question fits with the IIN theme or if it's just an arbitrary query / rant / diary entry? I guess that's kind of what you were suggesting anyway.

        As long as the moderators are good I can see how it could work. If you have it as an option (tick box) on the current 'question submission' rather than making it an entirely new type of question, it might encourage people to go down the traditional route and make the 'no voting' an exception instead of the rule?

        I don't think having the moderators pick and choose what questions to remove voting from is a good idea - sort of takes away the user control somewhat.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • myownopinions

    Personally, I'd love that, though I guess that's what the "other" option is for on some polls. Then again, comments on a topic are already pretty open-ended and sometimes deviate from the original poll choices.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • howaminotmyself

    I like the idea. I often find myself rewording a question just to make it fit the guidlines and pass moderation. I would prefer it to be open ended as to avoid this.

    Thanks for asking. :)

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Terence_the_viking

    Yeah.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • kelili

    I think that it is a marvellous idea. For one poll I've created I would have liked it to be that way.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • I think its a good idea because I see a lot of questions that cannot be anwsered with just a yes/no or a poll.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • lufa

    I like this idea. Sometimes I'd think of topics/questions that didn't really fall into voting or IIN. So open-ended questions would definitely make this site better.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • That would be great! Very impressive.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • anti-hero

    It's a good idea. It would save people the trouble of having to make a poll with 2 options like "I will comment" or "I have no comment".

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Couman

    I'm certain it would be popular. It might even be too popular. If people started mainly using the open-ended option, this site would lose some of its uniqueness.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • o_0

    I often comment on the story without voting ..so for me and many like me it would not be a big difference..
    but for all those who think its makes a difference then no problem.. better idea.. :)

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Sog

    People generally use the "classic" form to do this anyway even though technically it's not supposed to be used that way.

    The community seems to accept these kinds of posts, so I think it would be a good idea to promote them with it's own kind of form. Left as is, it does to some extent discourage them. Someone may look at Option A and Option B, realize that such a post doesn't fit either form, and then simply decide not to post at all.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dappled

    Obviously this is just a personal view, but I already use the classic style of question as open-ended. I virtually never vote and virtually never notice the percentage who voted something normal. For some reason the percentages (and the options to vote) don't appear prominent to me but obviously do to others because people do vote. Given that I use stories in the way you describe and that I enjoy them, I don't see why others wouldn't also feel the same.

    While we're considering new question types, though, I noticed one IIN member who likes to ask multi-dimensional questions (i.e. they want you to answer yes or no and also whether you are male or female and, say, a virgin or not) so you end up with eight poll answers to cover all the options as opposed to the three questions separately. I also notice sometimes people creating two polls (one for males, one for females as in the recent shoe size poll). I wonder if there's any chance of multi-question polls where the results are for each combination of answer per question? Or is this too complicated to be worth it for a minority of polls its relevant for?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • TheManagement
      STAFF

      This is also a very good idea, but will require much more thought and effort to implement. I'll keep it in mind for the future.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Shackleford96

    TheManagement actually made a post! :O

    I think it's a good idea, and I would surely use something like that. There have been posts I've submitted that I think having the option to exclude voting options on them would have been nice. I think it would encourage thoughtful discussion too. :)

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • cigs

    you should add it i have thought about this 3 months ago it looks like im not the only one who did.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • myboyfriendsbitch

    I think this feature would be good for people who ask things like "How did you lose your virginity?" and "What is your morning routine?", to compare stories and such. I don't think its very necessary, though. These questions aren't asked often and what would happen to the voting process for these questions? Voting on questions is what sets this website apart from a message board and it seems to be what attracts and hooks new users. I think IIN has enough activity to be expanded in some way, but how I don't know. Perhaps a database of the users in which others can vote on the individual users' normality as a whole?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • TheManagement
      STAFF

      One thing I've thought about in the past is that I could calculate some measure of how "normal" you are based on your previous yes/no votes compared to how the community overall voted.

      For example, if some question comes out to be 90% normal and you vote no, then you're a bit abnormal. If you said yes, you're a bit normal. If it's 20% normal the reverse is true.

      However, it's tricky because it's not clear what people mean when they vote. I think some people vote thinking "I do this" or "I feel that way" and others vote thinking "regardless of how I feel about this, I think it's generally normal". If the latter is common, then this scheme wouldn't really work.

      Also, the fact that this exists will influence how people vote. For the worse? For the better? I'm not totally sure.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • disfunkshinal

        Please don't do that. I, and a lot of others, already know how freaky we are. If we weren't freaky, we wouldn't wonder if we were. What I think you should do is have an option where you can tell us why our post didn't get posted. Because I swear I was serious about the sheep thing and you wouldn't post it. I admit to trying to be funny or shocking in the past, but you passed all of those. Maybe if I had an explanation, I could revise and resubmit. It would really help.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • GoraIntoDesiGals

        It could become a sport to be as abnormal or normal as possible thereby influencing choices.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • cigs

        Yeah agreed.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • myboyfriendsbitch

        I would enjoy having a feature like that, but thinking about it, some users could get too caught up in a low rating and feel all bad about themselves and stuff (so maybe optionally?).

        I, personally, vote both of the ways you mentioned. If I directly relate to the question, I vote normal, but sometimes if i know someone who can relate I'll vote normal as well.

        What if users could just go on one anothers' pages and vote normal? Or a poll-like feature in which others can vote on descriptive words chosen by the user?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • TheManagement
          STAFF

          Rating profiles is too open to attacks.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • cigs

            yeah it is. i bet i'd get a very low rating on mine.

            Comment Hidden ( show )