My cousin who is 20 says i'm stupid for thinking of getting pregnant at 35?

We were talking and I said I plan to have kids around 35 because I'm still single and also need time to become more financially stable work on my health etc and she's saying I'm weird that no one can get pregnant at 35 that eggs will be all gone by then and I'll be hitting menopause. This was a legitimate conversation. I told her lots of people have kids at 35 it's completely normal, even 40s is normal. My parents had me when my mom was 39 and my dad was 43! Lots of the parents I work with at my job are in their 40s and they all have babies.

She was pointing out how her parents had her at 21 and that she plans to have kids before she hits 25. I said that's really young none of my friends have kids and they're all over 25 and she said my friends are just weird.

This argument isn't ending, she's still harassing me about it saying I'm going to be an old mom and my kids are going to hate me if I have them at 35.

Is this normal?

Voting Results
15% Normal
Based on 39 votes (6 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 30 )
  • bbrown95

    Not normal, and she has no say in your choice. Also, she is 20 for crying out loud! She is barely even an adult and has very little life experience, so who is she to judge what you do and whether or not your friends are "weird" for making a different choice than her parents? Pretty typical for naive 20-year-olds to think they know everything, though (I also thought I knew way more than I really did at that age, lol). I personally think it's smart of you to want to have a stable and serious relationship first, as well as to be financially stable. I wish more parents would think about that, because their kids' lives would be so much better for it.

    My parents also had me in their 30's when they had been together a long time and were financially stable, and I think it made for a better and more stable childhood for me, plus they were more mature, had more life experience, and therefore were able to set a better example for me and teach me more.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • EnglishLad

    There is no "correct" age for a woman to get pregnant. The "correct" age is when she damn well feels like it, and nobody should be telling her what she can and can't do in her life.

    Go live your life as you damn well want and forget what your cousin thinks!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • SwickDinging

    Your cousin is unhealthily obsessed with your business. It's absolutely nothing to do with her.

    35 is certainly older, from a biological standpoint, but these days it is a fairly common age to start trying. I had my last baby after the age of 35. Certainly harder, but not impossible. If you haven't been through menopause yet then you still have a horse in the race. Just be prepared to hear yourself referred to as "geriatric" when you have your ultrasounds. That's what we all get called when pregnant after 35, in medical terms.

    Why does she care so much? Do you think she is jealous of you? You say she plans to have kids at 25... So she doesn't have any kids yet....

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • YE

    Your cousin is ignorant.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Clunk42

    Both of you are correct. Some people are infertile by 35. I don't think most people are, but some are. You might change your mind as you get older, and she might change her mind as she gets older. Most people, from my knowledge, who have children, have their first child before 40. You should have children when you find the time is right.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • JellyBeanBandit

    Your kids are more likely to hate you for having them when you were young, since you'd have much more financial problems and so wouldn't be able to afford to give them a decent upbringing. You'd also have less life experience to use in raising them.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • libertybell

    It's when you're a woman in your 40's when you have more of a chance of your children being born disabled. Not 30's.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • bigbudchonga

      That's just not true.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • RoseIsabella

    Your cousin sounds like a moron!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • GaelicPotato

    Your cousin is fucking retarded.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • ThatOneGuyYouNeverWantToMeet

    She's a dumbass. Having kids young almost never works out well (at least not here), the parents almost always go broke a few months to a year in & dump the cunt monkey off on their parents when it all go's to shit because they couldn't wait to be financially stable (fully paid off car/house & dependable job) before having kids.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Cuntsiclestick

      I know plenty of people who had kids way too early and had to depend on their parents for housing, cars, babysitting, food, paying off their debts, and a whole lot of other shit. They basically blew though their parents' 401k and pensions.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • bbrown95

      Very true. I have step family like this and it's a nightmare. They just had to have kids in their early 20's when they didn't have anything to their names, were in financial messes with credit cards and upside down on cars they couldn't afford, not in stable relationships (the one tried to baby trap a guy and, well, we all know how that usually goes), and have been constantly begging for money and pawning their kids off on anyone they can ever since. They also apparently weren't ready to give up partying, spending all of their money on themselves, and their unlimited "me" time, and are always looking for someone to babysit their kids for free all day long almost every day of the week. I don't think they actually thought about the fact that once you have kids, their needs come first, and that involves sacrifice.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Cuntsiclestick

        I remember talking to a few of the parents who blew threw their 401ks and pensions to take care of their grandkids and while they never complained to their kids about it, they felt miserable and said they didn't expect it to turn out like this. Worst part is, they're probably going to wind up like all the elderly people I've seen: once the money's gone and their health goes to shit, they get ditched in a lonely retirement home where their kids and grandkids barely visit.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • lorbsdoesnthelp

    35 seems like a great time to have a child. I think too many people think of having children as if they're like having pets. You're raising an entire human being for many years. 35 is generally a much more stable period of your life, therefore better for you and the kid. <3

    My mom had me at 39 and it's been fine. The only issue is that she has chronic health problems, but if she didn't, I'm sure it'd be even better.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Goldendoodlegirl

    I'm 52. I had my kids at 31 and 32. It was the perfect age for me, but I would have had kids up until I was about 37 or 38 if we wanted more. I would have been too young and too immature at 25.

    I have a few mom friends my age or older and a group of friends that are about 4 years younger. My kids are in college now, I never fully stopped working but I hit my career hard when they were in late high school and opened a couple e-commerce businesses as well.

    My dad was 54 when I was born and my Mom was 34 which was unheard of in the 60's. But my Mom's Mom was 40 when she was born in the early 30's. All healthy. All good.

    This is such a personal decision, do what you want to do.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Sounds like your friend can't see past herself and her experiences

    She grew up with young parents, she wants kids young, it's also an excuse for her to have sex and she doesn't need to rush for plan B or anything. All she can see are generations of people close together and being liberated sexually

    I'm guessing you see it as bringing life into this world and being able to provide a really high quality of life with which to rear your child

    My step dad was like 45 years older than me and it was good when I was like 10 and he was early 50s, but through high school he just became a huge dick, too much to go into here. Your friend may have seen this in others and wants to save you. Also, some women do lose eggs in their 30s. I'm pretty sure you can test your fertility

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • bigbudchonga

    40s is not normal. There's a 50% chance you won't even be able to get naturally pregnant once you hit 40, and a 5/10% chance once you hit 45.

    First world countries are fucked because people are having very few kids, and they're only starting when their biological clock is nearly dead.

    It's really sad. You're reasoning makes sense, and a lot of women who are clever leave it really late, and even then they have none 1 or 2 kids. But essentially, since we've created contraception, people with good genes are failing the evolutionary race in alarming numbers, and those who are too stupid to use protection or don't plan their future are the ones who breed young and a lot, and thus will be the people of tomorrow.

    Your thinking is normal. To be honest, you're thinking, the thinking a lot of people have on this matter, is devastating to humanity and won't be around for long, because it goes completely against the natural progress of evolution. It's tragic what modern society wants us to prioritize. IQ in the west has been falling for decades now. We're literally devolving, and we'll continue to.

    Just look at the replies you've got to this. No one even sees a problem that's as plain as day. You have the right to do whatever you want in this regard, but on a large scale, people are choosing to do what you're doing and it's causing real problems.

    You're cousin's wrong for harassing you about it though. She should explain the reasons why she thinks it logically and then let you choose.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • COVID-19

      There's no evolutionary race bud. Just people living their lives.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • bigbudchonga

        There always has been and there always will be. Just because we're not making any attempt to do well at it doesn't mean it's not still happening, as it has since the dawn of life.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • https://youtu.be/sP2tUW0HDHA

        Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Your contraception comment, stuff like that leads me to see design in how society has developed

      Smart/successful/wealthy people wait for or don't have kids, then everyone who has kids for the wrong reasons spreads their genes around, the school system is catered to ready most of the populous for entry level work, and the obvious benefactor to this set up are people who have a vested interest in the economy

      I don't know the title but someone told me about a book predicting society's development that was astonishingly accurate. Almost seems like it could be a manuscript

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • bigbudchonga

        "I don't know the title but someone told me about a book predicting society's development that was astonishingly accurate. Almost seems like it could be a manuscript", yeah I'm not surprised. All you have to do is follow certain patterns and how they fit in with the systems around us.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Clunk42

    Something I notice that a lot of people are saying on here is the equivalent of saying, "People in their twenties are financially unstable." That is not the case. For example, my parents had their first child in their twenties, and they were perfectly financially stable. All it takes is a good job, which someone in their twenties can have. If you (or the person you marry) has a job that can pay for a family, then you are not too financially unstable to have a child. The idea of "wait for financially stability" is stupid if you are already financially stable.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • a-curious-bunny

    You can have kids but you shouldn't. When you have kids at that age you are far more likley to have kids with issues. You may not care about that but personally I think its pretty fuvked up to be ok with intentionally letting someone have a high risk of being retarded or something. Letting someone go through life like that is just cruel. Having children is a young persons game

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • EnglishLad

      My mother was 36 when she had me and I had a perfectly natural birth with no physical defects, so your comment is pure bullshit.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • a-curious-bunny

        Its actually proven you are of higher risk to be born with defects through longer the mother waits. Ots science feel free to research it

        Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Ellenna

      Wrong! It's after FORTY FIVE not thirty five that there's a slight increase in the chance of having a Down Syndrome child, which some people wouldn't care about anyway.

      Stop spreading bullshit, not to mention ableism.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • a-curious-bunny

        I never stated any age mate simply said the older you are the higher the risk. Sheath that anger young one. Its also pretty fucked up to not care about having a down syndrome child. Knowing the risk yet doing it anyways intentionally putting someone through a life of living hell. Thsts just pathetic and greedy

        Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Clunk42

      "Letting someone go through life like that is just cruel." Saying that is just cruel. You don't know how happy people with developmental issues are going to be in life. As a person with two brothers with Down Syndrome, I tell you, they are quite happy with their lives. To claim creating someone's life with a slightly higher chance of their being a developmental issue is torture for the person you just created is a terrible way of thinking. Do you agree with genociding disabled people, because, according to what you're saying, they live torturous awful lives, and it's better for them to have never been created in the first place. If it's better to not even risk creating a disabled person than to create a person who probably isn't disabled, then wouldn't it makes sense to kill all of the disabled people that are still alive, if their lives are so horrifically torurous? You don't know how happy these people are or are going to be; you shouldn't go killing them or preventing them from ever existing in the first place just because you think they'll be unhappy.

      Comment Hidden ( show )