Metoo is actually more complicated
I had a discussion with a liberal colleague earlier and she cited the MeToo movement and said sexual harrassment is rampant in the work force with bosses harrassing their female workers. I started reading about it and looking at some of the cases in the media. And it seems to me its not always simply sexual harrassment just because the boss/supervisor texts the girls perverted texts and has sex with them.
It seems that often times the women are actually willing participants and at times even sounded like they were purposefully seducing their supervisors to move up in their career. It then seemed like in some cases after they seduced the supervisor and it didnt help their career as much as they hoped or even when it did they decided to turn around and claim they were sexually harrassed by their bosses and showed texts of their bosses saying things like "you looked so hot today" but they tended to leave out the information about their texts where they were feeding into it, even encouraging it.
So I asked myself is it always sexual harrassment when a supervisor has sex with an employee or is it more on the side of being unprofessional. Both are bad, but some cases dont seem to really be sexual harrassment even though people claim they are. I think that is a very serious accusation and someone shouldnt be labeled a predator if they arent.