Life- the cause of death

Most people (not me) are extremely biased on the true cause of Death.

They don’t want to recognize that, although old age and medical issues keep people’s Safety in Danger, all these things stem from the abomination of Life.

Fact- 100% of all death is caused by Life.

Thus it can be known that life is a dangerous thing and must be exterminated.

“But you’re biased”

Un-True.

You see I've spent half my life as an Emo rocker guy who listened to Nu-Metal but have now spent an Equal amount of time as a Preppie and thus can see the totality of life from an Impartial Perspective making me a Non-Biased Poster on this issue.

I’m not a fan of novel sized threads so I’ll end it here but is this normal?

Is my brain-storming on the Death Policy and how it should be implemented common?

Voting Results
36% Normal
Based on 28 votes (10 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 35 )
  • dom180

    Life does not cause death; life is the only alternative to death. Life combats death for as long as it can, despite life being doomed to fail. If death is something to be demonise, we should not accelerate it, but embrace life and use it to hold off death. This is an equally valid assertion. Surely this makes life glorious, and shows it should be encouraged not exterminated?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • nobleserpent

      I welcome Discussion, but don't misunderstand me.

      The point wasn't to demonise death but to show that in truth the author of Death is Life and to open your eyes to the dirty dog it is.

      What makes your opinions better than my facts?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • dom180

        If life is bad for causing death, then we must accept that death is bad. That is the point I was making, based entirely on the logical interpretation of YOUR "facts". By accelerating the death of life we are not solving anything.

        Speaking of which, what makes that a "fact"? You say "100% of all death is caused by Life". I may be being dense, but please explain and prove this. It stinks of opinion to me.

        Am now thinking that you are probably a try-hard troll, but I'll humour you.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • nobleserpent

          "By accelerating the death of life we are not solving anything"

          Can you deny that when People are finally relieved of the burden of this life that all Suffering, Injustice, and Cruelty would end?

          Is it better to have the appearance of True Justice (Life is not the author of Death) or to be committed to the actuality of it?

          I'm seriously worried that you can't even comprehend a simple phrase like "100% of all life..."

          _

          Death is brought about by old age/medical complications.

          old age/medical complications couldn't possibly exist without Life.

          Hence if A (Life) = B (medical issues)
          B (medical issues) = C (Death)

          Then A (Life) = C (Death)

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • dom180

            I cannot deny this, but as there would be no-one to benefit from removal of suffering, injustice and cruelty such a move would be pointless. Is it not better to live with these things than not live at all?

            -

            Wrong. Medical issues COME ABOUT DURING life. They are not caused by life, and definitely DO NOT equal life. You misunderstand the function of the "=" sign. And medical issues (sometimes) LEAD TO death, they are not equal to death. Your use of "=" (i.e. "equals sign") serves to misrepresent and distort your point from perceived causation to synonymity.

            As a side-note, you are a fool if you believe that having been both an emo kid and a preppy kid gives you a good view of the "totality of life". Maybe from an American highschooler's perspective, yes. What about the rest of the world? There is life outside highschool, which is really much more diverse than life inside it.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Ono

    You're trying way too hard.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • nobleserpent

      So let me get this straight.

      If someone's Facts doesn't agree with your opinion then suddenly their trolling?

      Is that the conclusion you're refering to?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • There is no winning with these people. They are blinded by there own ignorance. Feel sorry for them.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • Ono

        I never accused anyone of being a troll.

        I never suggested that the OPs 'facts' don't agree with my 'opinion' either.

        I said the OP was trying way too hard. ie overreaching, just as you did in your hysterical reply.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Uzzie101

    What? Life doesn't CAUSE death, life just ends BECAUSE of death. No one died simply because they were alive, people stopped living because of another reason. The logic is flawed.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • If you are dying, then your living. If your living then you are dying. It's that fucking simple.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Uzzie101

        That doesn't mean that life initiates death, it's the alternative state of being.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Okay. :]

          Comment Hidden ( show )
    • nobleserpent

      Sir you have been emotionally compromised and so blinded with anger that you can't possibly form a valid opinion this issue.

      If you would just Calm Down I'm sure you'd see that I'm right.

      "the logic is flawed"

      Your saying so doesn't make it True.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • nobleserpent

        Oh and as I said in the Original Post it is true that medical issues/old age contribute towards Death but that the medical issues/old age flow from Life.

        If A = B, B = C, A = C.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • God I'm awesome ;D

          Comment Hidden ( show )
      • Uzzie101

        But think it through logically, life doesn't cause death. Something else causes death, which is the end of life.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dalmationUntoyourSoul

    please kill me or at least cut off my arms or testicles. i wank too much and my safety is in danger.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Avant-Garde

    This is a interesting theory. "Life is the cause of death..." a good point. But if life is exterminated than their would be no death. Nothing would exist or would we exist on a different plane? I think life gnaws at peoples bones and tears them to shreds. I think a hard life can cause a somewhat quick demise as suppose to living a life that is peaceful. You should really write down your philosophies.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Flirty108

    I dont get what the point is, what are u asking, is death normal?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • 54% normal so far.

    Excellent. It's good to know there at least some courageous Atheists out there that want to be on the right side of history.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • thinkingaboutit

    your facts are feeble wailings. and life doesn't cause death; thats just morbid. Do you understand the concept of causation? life is a state of being. death is the absence of life, like darkness is absence of light. I think your a loser for capitalizing words as if they are forms.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • nobleserpent

      Lol I can see why you'd be upset when I've single handedly put to bed all of your misconceptions on Life and Atheism.

      Why can't I Capitalize what I want?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • thinkingaboutit

        lol. your a loser.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Life is the absolute cause of death Capt'n Obvious. Now, the advocate of censorship that you are, you may delete this comment too...while you fire up another blunt.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • nobleserpent

    I hesitated on making this part of the OP, not sure whether this was really the case or Not.

    I am sure now.

    Atheists are by far the most Biased and Selfish of all people. They, above everyone else, will lower themselves to any means to survive.

    -Thus Atheists must be first to be Culled by the Death Policy-

    I know that sounds harsh but I think you'll agree if you read this carefully and in the end Atheists will thank us.

    Sometimes people just need a helping hand.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • dom180

      "Atheists are by far the most Biased and Selfish of all people. They, above everyone else, will lower themselves to any means to survive."

      Proof? And reason why this deserves death? And reasons why if you are killing everyone at some point if makes a difference who dies first?

      Try-hard troll is doing it wrong.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • izakthegoomba

      Where did you get that idea from? What about atheism makes people biased? If anything, it would appear to make them less biased. And selfish? You appear to have fallen for the fallacy that only religion can teach morals.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • zchristian

    Death and life is 2 sides of the same dice.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • izakthegoomba

      And what are the other four sides?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • nobleserpent

      *are

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Death and life are one in the same.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • thinkingaboutit

      according to who, heraclitus?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • nobleserpent

      Finally, someone who isn't afraid to say the Truth.

      This is -exactly- why Death must be stopped.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Obviously, the people on this site are VERY stupid. All thinking they are smartest person. Haha.

        TO THE IIN COMMUNITY: What a joke you people are.

        Comment Hidden ( show )