It is normal to weight 44 kg at age of 22

i weight a lot less than the average i am male

Voting Results
18% Normal
Based on 44 votes (8 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 12 )
  • BlackyHancock

    That depends on your height.

    If you're short and female, probably ok, if you're 6'5" male you have a problem. You are a walking skeleton.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • lundi

    Wow you're lighter than me. I'm a 158cm tall female and I weigh about 46kg - still considered underweight.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Cuntsiclestick

    I used to date a guy that weight. In my area, it's not really all that common for a guy to weigh under 100 pounds. If it bothers you perhaps you should work out a diet and exercise plan to try to gain weight?
    :)

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • It is if you're a fucking manlet. I'm assuming you must be short too, because if you were a normal height at that weight, you'd have vultures following you everywhere you go.

    I feel your pain bro. 5'6 and 110lbs at age 19 myself. I'm not afraid to admit it, even though the feminist bullies on this site like charli.m are going to use it as ammo against me. Fat shaming is assholeish according to them, but apparently height shaming men is fair game, even though height is something we have minimal control over, while fat can be changed through diet and exercise.

    Us manlets are going to have to work a lot harder than all these tall assholes who get everything handed to them on a silver platter, and in the end we're going to have a lot more character to show for it.

    There's all these scientific studies that try to prove shorter people are genetically inferior. The common belief is that tall people are smarter because tall men fit the beauty ideal and have more of an ability to mate with women from the presumably more intelligent upper stratum, among other reasons.

    I've never believed in that shit. Maybe it's true within the boundaries of 1 race, but if you look at the correlation between IQ and race across the board, you'll see it contradicts that belief. East Asians, who have the highest average IQ, are among the shortest races, while Africans, the tallest race, have the lowest average IQ. The races with a weaker physique had to compensate by using their mind to conquer issues, and that's why Asians and Caucasians evolved to be the smarter races, with the smaller frames. The physical strength of Africans was a great asset for survival in their environment, so intelligence was not a criteria of natural selection for them.

    Before I offend some sensitive soul, I'll clarify that there are Africans with genes for intelligence who I would encourage to reproduce. I'm not talking on an individual level, I'm talking strictly about averages here. I don't consider it immoral to be of the belief that the thugs and murderers in ghettos such as Compton, who are reproducing at a faster rate than most other groups in America, should be sterilized. However, I have no problem whatsoever with the civilized portion of the African population reproducing and strengthening their racial stock.

    I'm tired of retards who demonize everyone who tries to form an objective view of reality. Mate selection in its current state is impractical and degenerate. Natural selection is no longer the guiding principle of reproduction, so if we choose not to focus on these issues of genetics, humanity will deteriorate in the long run.

    Sorry for going a bit off topic. My main point is, I do not believe tallness has a positive correlation with intelligence.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • charli.m

      I'll thank you for not a) dragging my name into ahit like a fucking cunt; b) not accusing me of shit I don't do; and c) not calling me a fucking feminist just because I have a vagina.

      Why don't you try actually knowing shit before running your mouth off?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Azaman

      His question had nothing to do with intelligence, retard.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • I wrote something related to the topic, because I'm not one of you retarded fucks who just writes generic "ya, it's normal" responses. It's obvious it's not normal, and anyone with common sense realizes that, so obviously this thread was just to start a discussion, not to ask directly if it was normal or not. How stupid can you be?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Azaman

          What you wrote is hardly related to the topic, pipsqueak. Take your dumb rants somewhere else.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • The question was about male body size. I wrote about what male body size means, and contradicted the bullshit spread about men of smaller body sizes. It shouldn't be that hard for you to understand.

            Comment Hidden ( show )