Ask Your Question today
Pretty self-explanatory, is rape of sex offenders (this would include rapists, child molesters, etc.) in prison what they deserve?
Please give your opinion in the comments. :-)
| Yes, they deserve it. | 49 | |
| No, no one should ever be raped regardless of reprehensible crimes | 60 |
1. Rape is never ok.
2. I do not have enough faith in the criminal justice system to seriously believe that every single sex offender who is incarcerated is actually guilty of the crime that they're in for. I'm sure the majority of them are but I'm not convinced that they all are. I would rather not chance the rape of someone who might actually be innocent or in there for a charge that did not involve actually raping or molesting someone.
3. Rape is violence and violence just encourages more violence.
I like Ultra Violent video games. And commit acts of Ultra Violence when 50 miles out in the middle of nowhere 4x4 accessible only. It's my catharsis.
I agree not everyone in prison deserves to be anal raped
It's amazing that at this time almost half of you condone rape. No wonder society is so fucked up. Would those of you that voted it's ok like to be the one doing the raping? I'm a little nervous you make answer yes.
I would go with no, although I would also say I wouldn't really hold pity for them. What Neuro said is also true, we don't know how many people that were put in prison for a crime they didn't commit so it's best not to take the chances.
Also, if we justify it happening then we're justifying rape, as in we're supporting a rapist, in jail or not.
Rape is never ever okay, right, permissible or justified. Rape is not a lesson. Rape is not just desserts. Rape is not punishment. Rape is not karma.
Anyone who advocates rape, accepts rape, supports rape or encourages rape is a rapist.
No, because some of the offenders might enjoy you raping them. instead, i propose we cut their dicks off since they clearly are not responsible enough to own a dick
So, an 18 year old woman, and a 17 year old boy are intimately involved. They exchange pictures with nudity. She is caught and convicted of possession of child pornography. She takes a plea and ends up in prison. She deserves to be raped? Interesting opinion. And say that doesn't happen? It really does in the good ol USA.
I meant actual rape. If someone is a year younger it really doesn't matter unless it is an actual rape in which the victim did not consent.
Except that it does. The 18 year can go to prison and they would be a convicted sex offender. That's the question: sex offender, not rapist.
They could even both be under age and the one receiving could be convicted of possession of child pornography and the sender could be convicted of creating it. And they could be tried as adults. Think that doesn't happen? Think again, it can and it does.
hell yes fuck his ass dry and hard!!! then do it again and cum in his assss
There is a pretty simple test for determining how appropriate a punishment might be; if the punishment is something that is punishable under law then that punishment can not be done. The only exception would be incarceration, simply because, other than creating another Australia, there is nothing else to be done with people that can not live peaceably in society.
This is also why most civilised countries do not have the death penalty. The "eye for an eye" thing is the way primitive cultures view and handle these matters. I would like to believe we've come a little further than that in the last few thousand years.
Seriously? How can you fucking justify this eye for an eye bullshit? What if he realizes what he did was fucking wrong, and he just wants to get out of prison and live the life he has the rights to? Fuck this consequentalist bullshit.
Those who are still not convinced, take something you really wish you hadn't done. Maybe you shat your pants in school, you got mad and broke up with your partner or maybe you stole something. According to your logic, you deserve what you had done to other people regardless of your moral perspective on what you had done before.
A lot of times in life the eye for an eye happens automatically . People often get what they deserve. By this i mean, if you break up with your partner you may have someone break up with you as well at some point.
There is karma in this world, i really believe that. Thats why its always good to treat others like you want to be treated.
Well I don't really believe in karma.
Anyway, IMO, you did not respond to my statement correctly. I argued against eye for an eye. In your breaking up example, breaking up with your partner is not immoral, because you would have a just reason for doing so (presumably) and if your future partner breaks up with you as well, she would have a reason for doing so.
Secondly, does the fact that you were evil before justify evil against your present, moral self?
I was not debating you or supporting you. I was merely making an observation, that regardless of whether you think "eye for an eye" is right or wrong, nature often does it anyways. It just happens a lot of the time whether you think it is justified or not. There seems to be some kind of universal "balance" that keeps things in order most of the time. So that people who fuck over other people tend to pay for it in the end somehow, even if its not always clear to us what their "punishment" is. Sometimes they may not even pay for it themselves, maybe their family or their nation pays for their actions. And its not always 100% guaranteed there will be a perfect balance all the time, but things tend to play out as they should most of the time
You make good points and i am not an expert in morality so i dont have the answers, nor do i make the laws, i just follow them
That would tend to explain why your opinions make so little sense... you believe in magic.
An unseen force that makes things happens meets the definition for magic. You can call it anything you want, that doesn't change what it is. If you behave a certain way out of deference to such an unseen force you either believe in magic or you're an idiot. Wait, that's the same thing.