Is it true every cigarette you smoke 12 min. subtracts from your life?

Is smoking a cigarette taking away 12 min. of your life?

No 46
Yes ^-^ 38
Other (comment) 2
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 37 )
  • DannyKanes

    False. My gf's Opa smoked everyday from 17 right up til his death at 91. He passed away from old age, not lung cancer.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Kiddles9

      Maybe if he hadn't smoked he would've lived until he was 105!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • DannyKanes

        91 is still a good innings man

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Kiddles9

          Oh I know, but if he hadn't have smoked maybe he would've been the oldest man to ever lived.
          But no in all seriousness I don't know if it takes 12 minutes off your life every time you smoke but I know it does serious damage. Maybe this person was just lucky, because I have had a lot of family members who smoked die from lung cancer or some other disease or/and have killer asthma because of it. And I know for example my mom she smoked from when she was a teenager to in her 30's a few packs a day. She quit when she got married because she knew she was going to be wanting kids. But even though she didn't smoke when she was pregnant my brother still has pretty bad asthma because of it. So it's not just yourself it affects.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • DannyKanes

            Oh yeah, of course, smoking does have an effect on your health, I'm just saying the 12 minute thing is a myth :)

            Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Cherrybombpieee

      What the fuck is an Opa is that like a opa loopa or something

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • DannyKanes

        It's the Dutch word for grandfather.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
    • DiamondGirl

      Really, Because My Husband smokes and he won't quit. and Im worried about his health. Was he Asian?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • DannyKanes

        No he was Dutch

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • DiamondGirl

          I was just curious. Because I heard something like foreigners have longer life spans, but who knows for sure.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Darkoil

            Genetically, age is not associated with race. Ethnicity plays a large role when we factor in different aspects of life like local diets and customs.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Darkoil

      He may have lived longer if he hadn't smoked.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • DiamondGirl

        I think 91 is a pretty long time to live, He couldn't have lived much longer, maybe a year or two, 91 is way past the average life span for a man. That's why there's all these old women I see, with out husbands.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • DannyKanes

        91 is a good innings man

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Darkoil

          Yeah I know man, I was just saying it like what if.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Theres nothing else better to do than smoke.Unless you got money to go to a fuckin casino.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hugh*Janus

      You win 'Comment of the Year' award.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Shroot

    Why is there no option for

    No^-^

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Caity21Lifee

    .-.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Hugh*Janus

    Smoking a cigarette could also add 12 minutes to your life. It could even save your life! Who gives a fuck?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • kupokupo

    Think about the science behind this. How is it actually possible to make a prediction on how much time of your life is lost by smoking one cigarette?

    Well one way is to take a chain smoker and take a non-smoker and compare their age at death, then record the number of cigarettes smoked by the smoker and use simple mathematics to get down to time lost by one cigarette.

    Now what variables are there that could make this experiment inaccurate? Actually, there are lots --- diet, initial age differences between the test subjects, physical fitness of the subjects, their lifestyle etc etc. In fact, the subjects would have to live exactly the same life, with the only difference of one person smoking, to make an even remotely accurate result!

    In the end, this 12minutes number comes from lots of guesswork, statistics and assumptions, also it's more than likely rounded up a bit to make it more scary.

    Either way, smoking is a pretty horrible habit as the companies tend to throw in some chemicals you don't want to put anywhere near your body! Not to mention, it gives you some nasty yellow teeth! And I quite like my teeth the way they are, thanks!

    Hope you enjoyed reading :D

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Psoriano

    I'm not sure it can be established with precision, since you can't know for certain how long a person would have lived. It's all statistics... but who knows. The thing you know for sure is that smoke is poison, and that's enough.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • thegypsysailor

    Why would you even doubt it? American tobacco companies add some interesting chemicals to the paper to help make them MORE addictive, like; Formaldehyde!
    You know, the stuff they preserve a body with.
    Whether it's 12 seconds, minutes or days, you can bet that smoking tobacco will shorten your life considerably.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Caity21Lifee

    Woah lotta comments ;D

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • basalt

    No. If you throw a dice a trillion times, the average score is 3.5. How many people throwing their dice get a score of 3.5, though? In this case, not a single one. Zero people are average here, out of a trillion tested. Same with coin tossing. Average doesn't mean majority. It means mean.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • White___October

    Impossible to say since you never know how old you otherwise would have become. Besides, it's different for everybody. There are some people that are still quite young but there's just about everything wrong with them and still they keep on smoking. If they would just stop smoking, perhaps they'd get healthy again. It just infects them more than average. There are also people that can smoke their entire life and there's never anything wrong with them. They're lucky it infects them less than average.

    But my opinion is to better be safe than sorry. Therefor I don't smoke. I never did and never will, I just don't want to.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • I think smoking in relation to longevity varies from person to person. My great grandma died when she was well into her 70s and she was a daily smoker for 30 plus years. My great grandpa also heavily smoked for most of his life and he died in his 80s. You cannot really determine who will be killed by smoking.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • SuperBenzid

    No you can't really work it out without knowing the specifics of the individual smoker. This due to light smoking being less damaging than heavy smoking. You could do a statistical analysis on average life loss from smoking for the individual if you had the specific data.

    The problem is that these are all probabilities. Some people in my family chain smoked until they died of old age with no cancer. I don't smoke but unfortunately I am just as heavily addicted to nicotine. About 100mg of nicotine a day.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dom180

    Maybe on average, but it isn't likely to be true for one person. It's not like the heart attack destined to kill you will come 12 minutes earlier because you smoked a cigarette once or anything.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • SuperBenzid

      Actually nicotine does damage the linings of blood vessels in the heart so if you are destined to die from a heart attack that cigarette really could cause you to die 12 minutes sooner :P.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • dom180

        I know, I'd just be surprised if the model had that kind of precision down to the quantum cigarette. Who knows, maybe it is true? :P

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Acerbic

    There's no exact number of minutes. I've heard anywhere from 5 to 12, but the most common number is 7.
    We all know that smokers, on average, live shorter lives than non-smokers.
    As for the smokers, if you were to average in how many years a group of otherwise healthy people smoked and how many cigarettes per day, then compare their lifespans to one another, you would find that the ones who smoked less would live longer on average, but not by much. That's because there is absolutely no way to quantify how many minutes a cigarette takes off a person's life- there are simply too many variables. Aside from environment, which is a big enough problem, there's also genetic variability to contend with. Some smokers who smoke the same amount for the same number of years develop emphysema or lung cancer and some never have any complications at all and live to be just as old and healthy as anyone else.
    So no, there is no exact number for everyone. Every person who smokes has their own.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • shuggy-chan

      Well u don't want me to outlive u and be lonely now do u dear? Maybe u should start cutting back so =/

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • kelili

    I've heard something similar once but I don't really take those things seriously. We all will die one day.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • peterr

    Most people who smoke would suck a cock.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Sog

    No, but you are greatly increasing your risk of dying relatively young from lung cancer.

    These "calculations" aren't very meaningful in themselves.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • jeebley

    Actually 12 mins and 17 secs, but yes.

    Comment Hidden ( show )