Is it normal to think that chinese should keep "one- child policy"?

The Chinese immigrants and travelers make corners on baby milk in Aus & NZ and the Western Europe (e.g. Germany, Netherlands) and local mothers are not able to get from the stores. Shortages of foods are not limited to baby milk - soy bean, dairy, fresh fruits, grain, seafood. 13 hundred million in mainland and more Chinese around the globe endangers environments on our earth. The Chinese government should NOT loosen the One-Chiled Policy, and we should restrict the Chinese going oversea in order to not invading and destroy our lands! Do you agree?

Voting Results
60% Normal
Based on 166 votes (99 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 36 )
  • dappled

    Disagree. Population increase isn't limited to the people who currently have the largest population. It's all of us.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • shade_ilmaendu

    I somewhat agree, except I think we should expand this policy, however in our Western societies it has to be carefully approached. I don't know how I feel about the government mandating something like that, what I would rather see is good, solid education provided to all citizens, calling for a vote in every nation to limit how many children we can have, and agree on a number. Two would be fair for keeping the population steady, but at this point I think we could use a bit of a decline... would have to factor in the amount of people who wouldn't have children into this equation as well. And maybe make some exceptions for adoption of kids already in orphanages who badly need homes. I imagine it would create a lot of problems at first, many people wouldn't understand how important this is... we don't have all the time in the world either.

    It's a complicated political discussion but ultimately I feel that it's important. As controversial as anything resembling eugenics is we need to look at long term benefit to the planet and society as a whole as opposed to the short term benefit of individuals. We've all become so goddamn individualistic we forgot how to care about each other, and look at what a mess things are.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • suckonthis9

    I disagree also. We do not need more government dictates. However, the Chinese people themselves need to make the Enlightened decision to begin their population decline far sooner than forecast. Currently, the One-Child-Policy is (practically) in effect for about one third of the population, in that country. Many more people will need to make the Enlightened decision.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Gravy

      I disagree that their laws are not enlightened. Remember their culture, not dissimilar to indigenous cultures is very community rather than the individual. This has nothing to do with politics, rather their inherited beliefs. Also, from my experiences living in Asia and also in indigenous Aussie community, democracy isn't so perfect. Ask an Bangkok from Cunnamulla, Wilcania, Meekathara, or Borraloola how they view democracy. I don't support any politics, but imposing democracy is not necessarily a good move. Ask Iraq.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • suckonthis9

        Mostly, this is because what the Unenlightened few, brain-dead politicians tout as 'Democracy', is a sham. In reality, almost all of us are living under a Neo-Autocratic regime.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • MissyLeyneous

          What we need are more Republics, like what America was supposed to be before the rise of False democracy. Real democracy is just as bad, however, because it IS two wolves and a sheep debating on dinner.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • suckonthis9

            Incorrect. What we need is a single 'Team Earth'.
            We need to totally re-organize our Socio-Political systems.
            Yes, for administrative purposes, the world will be separated (not divided) into regions and various levels of sub-regions.
            We need to discontinue this unsustainable Archaic notion of top-down, Autocratic, militant, bloated mismanagement of the Planet.
            This will be truly Democratic, not the Neo-Autocratic system of government we have today.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • RoyRogers

    They already limit how many children you have, and what does China have to do with coming overseas? Why do you hate Chinese people?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • richardbturgid

    Not normal to be OK with a policy which requires the government to kill an infant or cut the spinal cord of an unanesthetized 9 month old fetus then chisel out its brain bit by bit starting with the hypothallamus (the pain and vomiting center of the brain.)

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Matter_and_Energy

    The one child policy is disgusting and if more people knew about the problems it causes they wouldn't support it.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • umbdude

    The one-child policy seems like a necessity to me. Without that, all you'll get are more people in poverty and strains on food supply.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • hairyfairy

    We need that policy in England to stop the chavs breeding!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Too bad the fuckin Mexicans don't do that shit.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • 4creilly

    Im afraid not. Mother Earth controls the population no one else has a right

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • redoctober

    Chinese are quite filthy. I agree.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • 1000yrVampireKing

    Well I am not from china. However I think that was the point of one child.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Gravy

    The Chinese are definitely running out of land and are buying into large projects in Laos to ensure food supply.

    All other nations with positive population growth should follow China's lead.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • IDiGAFi

      Do you mean, every single other country, except for a few in Europe?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Gravy

        Not sure what I meant. What about, all countries with unsustainable population growth should follow China's lead and introduce measures to control their populations to sustainable levels.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • IDiGAFi

          That's pretty much all countries.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
        • Justsomejerk

          I thought you meant that all countries with unsustainable population growth should buy Laos.

          China is buying Australia's fertile land at an alarming rate.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • iluvdog

            China has illegally invaded Philippines, Tibet and recently Japan while they also buy huge lands throughtout the world. Chinese shortage of clean water, food, natural resources and even lands to live may caused disasters. The rest of the world get together to keep Chinese in their own land. We are also afraid of SARS, polutions by the Chinese.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
          • Gravy

            Chinese development in lamp in the last 2 years is unbelievable. They've just started a $7B railway all the way from Quming to Vientiane and have exclusive rights to 5km corridor either side of the railway line in return for loan. I see no problem with this however Laos will lose identity and become a Chinese state within 20 years. Goodbye forests, hello rubber.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • IDiGAFi

    I agree that they should keep the policy, but at the rate the rest of the world is growing, who the hell are we to tell them that? We should be implementing similar measures before we can tell them what to do. They are the ones who realized how big of an issue this is and started to act on it a long time ago, while we are still pretending like everything is fine and not giving a shit about anything.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • suckonthis9

      Archaic.

      Please refrain from using the term pertaining to a conjectural netherworld.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • IDiGAFi

        Hum... I don't get it. What term? What conjectural netherworld? Are you OK brain-wise, or is it me?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Gravy

          You refer to hell as being a living being rather than a underworld for the spiritually dammed.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • IDiGAFi

            Oh, I see. He confused me a little there. It's funny when they try to appear smart by using pretentious language but end up showing the opposite thing by misusing it.

            Hell is not a conjecture, it's a belief. I'm not in the mood to explain the difference, but those two are certainly not exchangeable.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • suckonthis9

              Violation.

              Please see Rule #8.

              Infringement.

              You have continued to use and have incited others to use an Archaic term.
              By your own admission, you have confirmed a belief in this.
              Caution: You are beginning to show contempt. Further willful disregard will result in an Ethical Downgrade or Diminishment.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Gravy

    I started to write about triplets born last night being given away to good homes in our local market this morning, but it is so fucking
    distressing, another time.
    good night everyone.

    Comment Hidden ( show )