Is it normal to think that charles manson is weaker than ted bundy?

In a fight of wits, or even in a physical fight Charles Manson would lose. Manson is all talk and no walk; whereas, Bundy all walk, and little talk. I think Bundy would have kicked his ass. Thoughts?

Voting Results
86% Normal
Based on 7 votes (6 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 7 )
  • Ilovewinter12

    Are we seriously going to talk about Ted Bundy again? I thought that was over, but obviously not.

    Though, Ted Bundy was 5'11' while Charles Manson is 5'2'',
    though height doesn't always mean a person is more likely to lose a fight.

    Still, Charles Manson talked shit about Bundy at one point, so that means that he knows who he was, as for Bundy, I'm not sure if he knew who Manson was.

    . . . Why am I even talking about this?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • ...Because you like Ted Bundy too......:)

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Oh ya, I recall what he said, "Bundy's is a poop butt, bundy is a rumpkin, bundy's his mama's boy; he's trying to prove something about his manhood".

      I personally don't get what he's saying. Is he saying that Bundy's cowardly or something?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Ilovewinter12

        Knowing Manson, that could mean anything, but I don't think it's positive.
        More than likely, he was calling Bundy a wimp, or something like that.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • dom180

    "My serial killer could beat up your serial killer!"

    Not sure what to think about this.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Holzman_67

    I think Manson is stronger. He is more manipulative which shows more mental strength.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • ted bundy was a gutless loser

    Comment Hidden ( show )