Is it normal to get into debates about this site's effectiveness???
IMPORTANT PART LEFT OUT OF TITLE: with myself. I honestly think about this for long periods of time. On one hand it's many people deciding whether or not something fits a norm, which society defines through majority, therefore making the methodology carried out by this site effective. On the other hand it is a group/community of like minded individuals deciding what does and does not classify as normal, which could skew the results. Is it normal to get into in depth arguments like this with myself? Also, feel free to opine regarding the above statements within the comment section.