Is it normal to distrust intelligence in our leaders?
There is an increasing trend towards choosing national political leaders who are, with the best will in the world, not just a few sandwiches short of a picnic, but an entire picnic short of a picnic plus the means of transportation required to get to said picnic.
In the Philippines, there is PNoy (a President with a tag) grinning like a dimwit during the Manila Hostage Crisis. In the United States, there used to be Dubya (a President with a tag) calling upon the world's nations to stop terrorism and then, in the same beat, asking the assembled media to watch how well he plays golf as if those two things are of equal importance. In the future of the United Kingdom there appears to be BoJo (a potential Prime Minister with a tag) who uses apparent stupidity as a political tool while remaining a serial liar, cheat and deceiver.
This isn't a question about PNoy or Dubya (who both seem creditable on some fronts) but about whether by distrusting intelligence in our leaders we have unwittingly created an opportunity for semi-intelligent leaders to feign ignorance and lead us surreptitiously.
Something else is going on | 9 | |
No | 7 | |
Yes | 22 |