Is it normal to agree that the roast game is fact?

The Roast Game is pretty simple. First ask any family member "what is special about a holiday roast?", The family member would have the tendency to guess assumptively "Ham", "Turkey", "Beef". You say "no" to the family member Then you ask them "who or what do you think is special?, The Family Member says "I believe that Children are special" You respond "So, you eat Children for a Christmas roast? "The family member would freak out at you because he knew that the Family ate Children and he is surprised that you knew it too. The whole point of the game is to get your point across, which is the idea that the Family eats Children as their Christmas roast, and you interview and prove your common knowing and realizing of the idea or tradition that families have. If they freak out, they already admitted it.

It makes logical sense because when you ask a family member these questions, you get the sense that the Family Member is assuming that I don't know what they were eating, making excuses like guessing average roast meats like "ham", " turkey", or "chicken" Then he faces your sudden answer "no" which gives him a sign that he is just making excuses to escape the question and to carry on with life.The roast game is just a psychological mind tester. It tests the human will to tell the truth.

Asides, it is easily provable by the fact that The Roast Game itself is easy proof that Families were eating their own Children after slaughtering them. After they slaughtered them they did this process where they skin the children, take out any fecal matter or anything inedible to humans, slice the right meat parts off like the "roast" meat, de-bacterialize the meat, season it, then cook it, after cooking it, they eat the Children. That is my proof, which is the logical explanation of the truth that is found out in The Roast Game. Which to be honest, is absolutely mind blowing.