Is it normal that anti-gunners think criminals are genetic supermen?
Anti-gunners say, "the criminal will just take the gun away from you and shoot you with it."
Aside from the groveling, wretched cowardice that this argument bespeaks in the person who employs it, why do so many anti-gunners think your average street criminal is some kind of Greek god, with reflexes so lightning-fast he will be able to take, say, my gun - which would be a SURPRISE to him, as I only carry concealed - away from me when I'm MOVING AWAY from him and am doing my damnedest to stay out of reach of his hands? (In reality, a criminal is seldom the "sharpest tool in the shed" - and he's looking for what he thinks is an easy target - NOT a challenge. He's more of a SCAVENGER, than a hunter!)
Also, is you average cop some kind of Khan-from-Star-Trek genetic superman who's better qualified to defend ME, than I myself am? I'm in excellent physical shape and practice under-stress shooting w/timed combat reloads regularly, unlike so many beer-bellied doughnut eaters in patrol cars who may only go to the range a couple times a year to qualify. (Many cops *but not all* ARE like that! But never mind that, THEY are "professionals" and therefore only THEY are qualified to defend themselves - and ME - against those mighty, Zeus-like criminals, right?)