Is it normal atheism ignores history?

Oh for crying out loud!
What a waste of time and thought to write that drivel, and read it.
Every civilization, tribe and group of man has MADE UP the gods of their need, for one purpose or another. Most often it is to control the group; "god will punish you for not doing what we, the ones appointed by god, demand" etc.
The bible is a stupid story book; can you possibly believe some guy parted the Red Sea? There may have been a physical event (earthquake bred tsunami?)that caused something notable, but no god had a hand in it.
Do you really believe that a man was born through immaculate conception, when his mother had other children? Please. If we are a creation of a god, then that god must be pretty damn bad at his job, because we are very imperfect beings. Isn't it much more likely that we are a freak of evolution and that there might be hope that if this species doesn't kill itself, and most of the others on this planet off, that perhaps we will evolve beyond the disgustingly destructive creatures we are today?

I'm an agnostic and atheists piss me off.

Is no one going to discredit this based on the horrible grammar at all? I cannot possibly believe in anything written so horrendously. For or against religion doesn't matter, because you failed.

"Alright a lot of atheists I seen say the"
Should be....A lot of atheists I have talked with...

"these civilizations liars"
Please look up what civilization is. The word you wanted was society.

"Yet would not give an alternative idea to this."
This isn't even a real sentence. What? Seriously, this means nothing. It is known as a fragment.

Your drivel about kings and queens seriously ignores all history. And the term for it is "Divine right," and didn't really exist until the christian church started killing people who wouldn't convert. The church was gaining more and more power, so the royals started saying they had divine rights in order to try to control some of the church.

The kingdoms started because a person/people settled an area of land. It had nothing to with religion at all.

Again, you use civilization improperly when talking about the slaves.

"America they use to have slaves. Its not like slaves is a new concept."
Used, we used to have slaves. Past tense. Second sentence, slaves are a new concept. The S at the end of slaves makes it plural, hence the need for are, not is.

Again, you use civilization incorrectly. The pharaohs were chosen by birth right, and rose to power like every other royal family. Killing, corruption, betrayal, and inbreeding. I'm pretty sure their polytheistic views did not include the christian god.

"While I will not say without a doubt god exist"
Exists. The dinosaurs used to exist. A living/spiritual thing exists.

"They even proved why the plague in Egypt was scientifically possible. "
I want a link to this. Because my entire college career was spent learning how none of the plagues could have happened as described.

"So for claiming to be so intelligent saying something is not possible when science has proved it can happen is pretty ignorant."
You can't even form a coherent sentence, yet you have the right to judge others as ignorant? And its proven, not proved.

"It simply means your too pig headed to see that your ideas might actually have wholes in them."
Calling people pig headed for expressing views that you yourself are expressing (although in this case opposing,) is not certainly going to garner you any friends. And the word is holes. Whole means something is complete. And you have no divine rights, no authority, and no permission to judge a single person on this planet. God has not given you that authority. So stop trying, hit the books again, and try to pass your English classes.

The Bible has been edited many times throughout history. It's like the phone game in kindergarten where the story is completely different by the time it gets back to you.

Humans build their own civilizations by establishing their control by doing things such as making up religions.

Atheism doesn't ignore history.
It takes on what we now know are facts, and clearly defines atheism as a lack of ANY factual belief in a god or gods.

Historical documents tells us that people were burnt alive for being witches. I don't doubt that people were accused of witchcraft and killed that way.

But according to your outlook, that historical evidence is proof that witches with magic spell casting powers were real. Just because people believed in God in the past doesn't prove God exists. Many cultures believed that fire breathing dragons existed.

It's usually the people who were 'appointed to rule by god' who made up the religions. Just look at Greek mythology. Every time a town/leader wanted more power, they'd make up some new god who they were supposedly related to.

atheism (n.): disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

1) Nowhere does this definition state that atheists don't believe that other people believe in God.

2) In my opinion, most atheists don't think the bible is stupid because some of the events told in the bible didn't happen, but because their are a lot of contradictions in that bible and they don't agree with a lot of the ethics about the bible.

Did Egypt have slaves? Yes, I'm pretty sure they did.
Does the bible say stuff about slavery in Egypt? Sure.
But the fact that Egypt had slaves isn't what atheists are arguing about.

Atheists do know that God (as a symbolic figure) had a lot to do with history. They just don't actually believe in God being real.

the Romans out-smarted all of us

Yes, my ideas have wholes in them.

I believe there are many different variations of what/who god is. I believe now-a-days, it's very construed and misunderstood.

I am religious. And I think what you just wrote is just naive and plain bullshit.

As a Devout follower of the Catholic Faith, I would like to say that this persons comments aren't typical of religious people, atleast the ones I've met.

TL;DR another post about why theism is better than atheism or vice versa.

Live at let fucking live already. I don't understand how people even have time to write this shit anymore.

Powerdumps

I will not even enter into this argument.
Suffice to say that it is drivel.

Watch Zeitgeist. Its a conspiracy theory movie but it makes it point.

I couldn't even understand the argument because it was so poorly written.

Are you saying that the only way a civilization can come to exist is through god? A group of people got together because they needed to survive, and humans are social creatures. We survive better in big groups. The people who had leadership qualities took the roles of leaders. Then they existed as a group of people, with a leader, who they eventually called a Pharaoh / King / whatever you'd like. Then they said that the Pharaoh was appointed by "god". This is really simple stuff. Like... 1st grade world history stuff. Is the post a troll? I don't understand.