Inn that i'm into vore?

37% Normal
21 Comments

TW: fetish, fantasy violence.

I'm into vorarephilia (vore). I've been into it since the age of 4 years old. Vore is a sexual fantasy involving people being swallowed whole by other people, monsters, animals, etc.

My specific fantasies revolve around an attractive young female either swallowing another human being whole and alive, or being swallowed themselves. In most cases, my sexual fantasy includes them being vividly, graphically digested alive as the prey struggles in vain. I probably think about such situations easily as much as I think about normal sex things, though if predator and prey are human, there may be sex involved. Sometimes I imagine consensual situations or willing prey, but most of the time the prey is completely caught off gaurd, swallowed alive (possibly stripped nude first) and digested in the stomach. This part entails a fair amount of gore and dismemberment. Often, the predator and prey are fairly similar in size, so the predator will develop a rather large gurgling belly as it digests the poor victim. This entire situation turns me on immensely, especially if an attractive woman is in either role or both.

Is it normal/acceptable to find this sexually attractive?

In the comments: are you into vore as well? Do you find it repulsive, bizarre, curious, sickening, or interesting?

Voting Results
37% Normal
Based on 76 votes (28 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 21 )
  • sourgrapes
    7 years ago

    No that's not bloody well normal.ffs.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    3
    3
  • RoseIsabella
    7 years ago

    Where is Tha Grape? Tha Grape knows how to keep tha muthafuckin shit real yo!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    3
    3
      -
    • sourgrapes
      7 years ago

      Yes this shit not bloody well normal.ffs.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      5
      5
    • ThrowawayAlt14159
      7 years ago

      Who is The grape?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • RoseIsabella
        7 years ago

        Someone who knows what's up.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        2
        2
          -
        • ThrowawayAlt14159
          7 years ago

          That's descriptive. ·_·

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          -2
          -2
  • Dogman77
    7 years ago

    So who here is a pedobear. I'm not the FBI or anything

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    2
    2
  • Drugzarebadmk4y20
    7 years ago

    If you're into vore stick your head in your ass until you turn inside out and guaranteed you'll cum instantly and with no cleanup cause it'll be inside, or outside?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    1
    1
  • HalfInsaneFemale
    7 years ago

    So that scene in Men In Black two where she swallows the dude should make you shoot a load

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    1
    1
  • johnpartridge
    7 years ago

    Hi there. I've spoken (online) to people with vore before. I have to admit that I cannot even begin to fathom what could possibly be arousing about it, but as someone with a non-standard sexuality (well, fairly vanilla, but I'm primarily attracted to girls aged 8-13) I have learned to keep an open mind and accept that human sexuality is far more diverse than most people think. You're a statistical outlier, but you're certainly not unique.

    We live in a society in which people assume that one's orientation towards male or female is primary. Nonetheless, I have spoken to people whose kinks put such orientation into second place. For example, I once spoke with a guy who was heterosexual in terms of romantic and sexual attraction, but who was so deeply masochistic and submissive that his ultimate turn-on was to be beaten by a burly, ugly male. It was precisely because he would be repulsed by the guy that he would find the situation all the more submissive. It sounds like you are ostensibly 'heterosexual', but that the vore trumps that orientation, and you could be turned on by a man being swallowed whole by a snake (for instance). Is that the case?

    To be honest, people here (and in society) find it hard enough to understand my sexuality, and other than a foot fetish and a statistically less common age range of attraction it's a rather vanilla sexuality. So I would imagine you'll get a few ignorant comments here.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
      -
    • ThrowawayAlt14159
      7 years ago

      Well... Ish. I am a heterosexual male, but I also STRONGLY prefer female pred or prey or both. It's not quite as clean cut as my heterosexuality, but it's pretty clear I'm mostly attracted to the idea of women either eating someone or being eaten by something.

      Interesting. I can't physically (or ethically!) practice vore, where as you can't ethically practice pedophilia. I share your inability to fathom why anyone would find what you're into attractive, but I guess that's just generally going to be the case.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • johnpartridge
        7 years ago

        I have never and will never act on the paedophilic aspect of my sexuality. But I don't think it's hugely hard to understand. Male friends of mine that I have told in real life either admit to finding youngish girls attractive (usually down to about 12 or 13 years old) or quickly work out what is and isn't attractive to me (because it's not that dissimilar - it's just about subtlety rather than needing chiselled adult faces or overt curves). For example, my ideal girl was Mackenzie Foy when she was around 10, 11 or 12. Most heterosexual males can see that she's utterly beautiful and can sort of fathom why I would be attracted to her:

        https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/db/86/33/db863340f1b2ac84ef9f0db83c3348e5.jpg

        Out of interest (and naturally you don't have to answer), if you walked around a corner and found her being swallowed by a large predatory animal, would the arousal factor exceed your arousal to walking around the corner and seeing an adult woman masturbating? Obviously you have to detach from any other consideration (shock, desire to help, etc.), but I'm sure you're aware that if your fantasies were feasible in real life your arousal might be drowned out by other feelings.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        0
        0
          -
        • ThrowawayAlt14159
          7 years ago

          I'd probably be very attracted to the situation. If say that the actor you showed a picture of is pretty but not at all sexy to me at that age.

          I think If I encountered any vore situation involving a human IRL, I'd get slightly red in the face. A 12-y.o. girl being, I.e. eaten by a snake would be sexy, as would a 12-y.o. boy, but not as much. An adult woman being eaten is much more attractive. An adult woman masturbating would be... Hmm... Unless she was exceptionally attractive, I think most vore situations I can imagine would be hotter, even with child prey.

          Hmm.. In real life, yes, shock, desire to help, etc, would occur, but they wouldn't override finding the situation really hot.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
            -
          • johnpartridge
            7 years ago

            Well, I concede that Mackenzie is more beautiful than sexy, but then she embodies ideal beauty rather than sexiness for me. Thylane Blondeau at that age exuded more sexiness:

            http://data.whicdn.com/images/28313478/original.jpg

            It's interesting not only that the arousal factor from the vore trumps the arousal factor from the woman herself, such that even prey that does not conform to your other preferred characteristics (including age) can be more arousing than what would be primary for more statistically common sexuality. It's also interesting that you would find a 12-year-old girl being eaten sexier than a 12-year-old boy being eaten. Why do you think that is? And would there also be such a distinction at a younger age, or with elderly victims?

            Comment Hidden ( show )
            0
            0
              -
            • ThrowawayAlt14159
              7 years ago

              I would say I don't consider her to be attractive either.

              I'm not sure why I prefer females over males in vore, even at ages where it's not like I find the girls/women sexual. Maybe something innate and biased like empathy for the victim?

              Comment Hidden ( show )
              0
              0
  • CreamPuffs
    7 years ago

    My boyfriend is into "soft" vore. I find it very weird, but not nearly as bad as "hard" vore, gore/torture fetishes, pedo fetishes, necro fetishes, and stuff like that. That stuff is so disturbing that it really puts things like just swallowing a tiny person whole seem almost mild.

    Not normal, but by far one of the better fetishes on this site.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
      -
    • johnpartridge
      7 years ago

      'Pedo fetishes' (whatever that means) certainly don't belong in the category of gore and torture, which is about taking pleasure in people's suffering. 'Necro fetishes' (whatever that means) don't either, given that necrophilia doesn't centre on having a living partner.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • CreamPuffs
        7 years ago

        Pedo means child. Basically, the fetishizing of children. I could've worded my original post better I guess.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        0
        0
          -
        • johnpartridge
          7 years ago

          No, that's OK, I understand what you're saying. I am disturbed by people who want to harm children (or actually do harm children), but I don't see what's disturbing about finding a child attractive.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
    • ThrowawayAlt14159
      7 years ago

      I'm not into pure hard vore, but I do like gory digestion. My basic limit is if the prey doesn't make it to the stomach alive, it's not for me.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0