Is it normal to want to say this to gay people who thinks everyone is a homo?

Now I mean only the gay people who think every men have homosexual tendencies like a famous gay man said, not every gay people out there. I want to tell them that like if we say that every gay people have hetero sexual tendencies in heart, they will deny it saying it comes from a straight man's perspective. Similarly I want to say to them that it comes only from their perspective, like we cannot understand their attraction to other men they cannot understand our attraction to women and the reasons we dont find men sexually attractive. I have seen comments on different news articles where gays claim that male friends who hug each other do it because they secretly enjoys it sexually. I want to say that yes I hug my male friends but not in the least because I enjoy it sexually, but because its called showing friendship. People who pat their pets, do they do it because they are Zoophiles? No! They do not understand our perspective, so they should not judge us by their own perspective. Life is not about sex.

Now suppose a man who hugs straight men refuses to hug a man he knows is gay. He is called a homophobe. But if a woman refuses to hug a straight man because she thinks he might want to hug her to enjoy her sexually, its okay. If a gay man kisses a man against his will he usually gets away with it easy. But if a straight man kisses a woman against her will he is accused as a sex offender and gets months of jail terms. I read a news that a man was raped by a bunch of gay men in a London train, but they were charged with simple burglary as there is no law against homosexual rape there. Is this fare? For heterosexuality carried out against someone's will we have punishments. But if we accept homosexuality as equal to it, we dont have equal punishment when its carried out against someones will?

In conclusion I believe a gay man (not all only those who do) should not judge straights from their own perspective, and homosexual offences should be as equally punishable as heterosexual offences.

Voting Results
71% Normal
Based on 7 votes (5 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 7 )
  • dom180

    You think it's understandable to refuse to hug a gay man because you think he might enjoy it sexually? I'm sorry, but that stinks of subtle homophobia. I also think it stinks of subtle sexism if a woman refused to hug a straight man for that reason. It's perfectly alright not to want to hug someone, but presuming the other person only wants to do it to sexually pleasure themselves is horrifically ignorant.

    I don't know where your facts are coming from, but homosexual rape is illegal in the UK. Rape is equally illegal over here no matter who is doing it to who.

    I've met quite a few gay people, and I've never once met one who thinks everyone is gay. I'm sure these people exist, but I'm sure they're not as common as you seem to think they are. Of course your main point is right - you shouldn't judge someone for their sexuality, and you shouldn't try and tell someone who they really are - but pretty much all your reasons seem to me to be underlined by homophobia.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • jeremybrown50k

      I cant post the link since it wont get posted, so heres the extract:

      A Man was abducted at gunpoint by three men from a rush-hour train on the London Underground, taken to a park and raped, police revealed last night.

      Detectives are investigating possible links between the assault and a series of sexual attacks against men in the capital in recent months.

      In the latest incident, a 19-year- old man was raped on Hampstead Heath in north London on Tuesday after being forced off a Northern Line train. Police appealed for witnesses to the abduction, which took place at 6.30pm.

      The attack followed six previous assaults on men in London during the summer months. One took place on an Underground train; in another, a man was raped after being abducted outside Leicester Square station. In August, a man was raped in lavatories at another central London tube station.

      In the latest case, the victim was travelling in an empty front carriage to Golders Green, where he had arranged to meet his girlfriend at a night school.

      The three men, armed with a handgun and a knife, walked in through a connecting door while the train was between stations. They forced him on to another train to Hampstead, where he was taken to the heath and assaulted by all three.

      Police believe the area was busy at the time of the attack, which lasted five minutes. They said the victim was in shock.

      The string of attacks in London has begun to focus public attention on the subject of male rape, sometimes termed the last taboo. While attitudes to female rape have been transformed over the past 20 years, there is a reluctance to acknowledge a phenomenon that challenges men's fundamental notions about their masculinity and invulnerability.

      Male rape does not exist as a criminal offence under British law; the assaults are recorded as non-consensual buggery. The Metropolitan Police investigated 30 such offences against adult males in the year ending last April, but welfare organisations believe that as many as nine in 10 incidents are not reported.

      Survivors, a national counselling organisation for male rape victims, received 600 calls last year. Henry Leak, chairman of the organisation, believes that they represent the tip of the iceberg.

      Mr Leak said that reluctance to report attacks stemmed from feelings of shame and humiliation. 'There is the fear that he will not be believed or that people will think that he asked for it, that he must be gay, or weak, unable to defend himself.'

      He also pointed to differences in the law - convicted rapists can be imprisoned for life, whereas buggery carries a maximum sentence of 10 years. The perception by some people of police officers as homophobic also plays a part.

      However, the growing seriousness with which this offence is treated is reflected in the Metropolitan Police's piloting of a victim support unit.

      According to Mr Leak, male rape is not confined to the homosexual community and, like female rape, it has more to do with power than sexuality. The effects, he said, can be devastating and long- term, with feelings of frustration, powerlessness and anger experienced by victims.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • charli.m

        Buggery is not burglary.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • jeremybrown50k

          But if I did it to you, it would be counted as rape!

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • charli.m

            Buggery = sodomy = anal sex.

            Forced implies without consent, ie rape.

            The terminology is different but it amounts to the same thing. The real issue is that there is any difference in terminology and the lesser sentence for an equally damaging act.

            But I reiterate...buggery is NOT burglary.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Mr-Myrtos

    True! Most gay people tent to think all other guys are gay.

    I think most gay people does not want to be gay alone. As if they are ashame to be what they are when there is nothing to be ashame off.
    I don't care about who is gay or straight. Its simply no topic of conversation among civilized people.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • VirgilManly

    " Non-consensual buggery" is a term often not used enough in daily conversation. It generally occurs when dealing with bankers, tax collectors or religious leaders.

    Comment Hidden ( show )