Is it normal to think young engagements are stupid?
An acquaintance of mine recently got "engaged" to her on/off boyfriend at 21, him being 19. Later in the evening she tried to convince my 20 year old friend to get engaged to her 22 year old boyfriend of only a year.
This may sound like I'm fixating on one anomalous person but I feel I'm hearing more and more about this, girls especially, seriously wanting to be and even getting "engaged" as young as 17 before they even move out of their poor parents' houses.
What is the point? Are teen/early twenties romances not infamous as short, melodramatic train wrecks? How do you know you will want your "finance" in a year, yet alone for " as long as you both shall live"? Just a few short years ago you were going through your goth phase and bragging about trying your first cigarette and now you want to be wedded in holy matrimony?
These people fail to consider the logistics of it, they have never lived with their "finance" and do not have university degrees, stable jobs, or serious long term plans. They just have this hazy daydream, probably focusing more on the wedding day than actual married life, of showing off their relationship, promising forever, being "us against the world" and all the usual cliches. They don't think of the divorce rate of 42% in the UK.
You may have noticed I use quotation marks for "engaged" and "finance" because, let's be honest most of these "engagements" are called off anyway and most of them go the whole way and break up completely, leaving them both looking like idiots.
So basically young engagements (22 or younger) are poorly thought through, doomed and generally embarrassing. Thoughts?