Is it normal to think that i wasn't born gay?

"The gene that studies link to homosexuality is an X-chromosome..."

You should not drink and post.

I assume you mean "allele", not "gene", unless you're talking about genetically modified people with extra genes. Also, what you have there is a corrolationary study, as genetic studies necessarily are. However, there is no strong evidence for a particular "gay" allele, and people with 100% genetic identity (twins) aren't necessarily both gay or straight, which pretty much dismantles the mendelian recessive inheritance hypothesis you're suggesting.

Are there examples of twins where one is gay and the other not?
That would be interesting.

Yeah its complete bull. No one is born straight, no one is born gay, no one is born bi, or pan. You know what people are born as? They are born as babies. When you hit puberty your hormones start kicking in and you develop a sex drive. it does not mean you were sexually active or had a sex drive before that.

None of these theories account for every single case of sexuality or sexual tastes and behavior. So they are irrelevant. They all say everyone of them is for sure and 100 percent true but since they do not apply to every case and cancel out each other they are garbage.

There is a theory sayings males with older brothers are more likely to be gay as it makes them more feminine however that does not take into account lesbians. This also says that all gay males are going to be feminine which is also not true. So by that we are saying lesbians are only gay by choice. Which is kind of sexist because that means men have a right to be gay because its not a choice women can choose NOT to be.

I think there is multiple factors to what develops your sexuality. Such as environment, trauma, how you were raised, genetics to some degree. Someone could be a sadist when they are little and the minute they hit puberty become a sexual sadist/masochist. Now that was part of the personality but it transferred over when they hit puberty.

When detectives investigate a crime, they have to be careful about presuming the guilt of a suspect prematurely, because they will start to construct a narrative from the evidence to support their presumption. They will view the evidence in a biased way, potentially incriminating the wrong person.

Similarly, I think you're presuming certain events must have shaped your sexuality, so you're looking at your childhood with bias; piecing together a narrative which supports your presumption but doesn't prove it.

Plenty of heterosexual women have poor relationships with their male family members. Plenty are exposed to porn and sex before they have the capacity to understand it, or interest to try it. It might affect their attitude towards sex in some capacity, or indeed individual sexual interests, but alter their entire orientation? I doubt it. So why are you so sure these events are why you're not straight?

Do you believe some people are born straight, where as you became straight? Or do you believe everybody acquires their orientation later on, through nurture (as opposed to nature)?