Is it normal to think probability does not exist in reality?

Is it normal to believe:

Probability does not exist in reality.
Probability is just a series of calculations humans do to navigate their innate sensory ignorance endowed to them by causality.
There are no boundaries where within freewill exists... It does not exist at all.

The illusion of free will is a natural side effect of sensory ignorance.
Omniscience is the only escape from this illusion.

In simple terms... The illusion of "now" is a result of the limitations of our sensory perception.

Probability requires the lack of reality to exist.

Probability is an educated guess based on the available data.... if you have all the data.... probability loses its meaning.
EX: You can't have curiosity when you know everything.
If probability exists knowing would mean not knowing... which is a seemingly obvious contradiction.
All the data = reality
The only reason we need to hold our hands out in the dark is because we want to increase our probability of not running face first into a wall... This is why we use lights , so we have more data about our surroundings, the more data we have the more obvious it becomes that probability doesn't exist... it's just a side effect of a lack of data.
Humans only get a glimpse through our limited sensory input aided by technology... we only need probability when reality is occluded...reality is anti-probability.

Probabilities are the silhouettes of the proverbial shadow puppets of ignorance cast on the wall of life by the light of reality.
The more light we have .... The less of the shadow puppets we see until they vanish.

Voting Results
63% Normal
Based on 24 votes (15 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 12 )
  • you_go_glen_coco

    Probably.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • hgjukbjk

    At the macroscopic level you're probably right, but at the quantum level things get weird. Everything down there is a probability distribution based on potentialities.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • walkingdildo

      Don't give us that quantum physics shit. Not here. Not now.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • hgjukbjk

        Did you read the OP?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Faceless

    Uhhh ergo vis a vis concordingly.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • donteatstuffoffthesidewalk

    please do not use -ists or -isms

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Crow

    I love shadow puppets and shit.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • walkingdildo

    "Probability is an educated guess based on the available data..."

    You've just demonstrated that probability does have some objective meaning.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • GamerVoice

      Yeah, it most defiantly has objective meaning.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • walkingdildo

        Then it is not an illusion.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • bucketfullofassholes

    We are just living in a reaility TV show, I am Bob Saget and this is Saturday Night Live.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • GamerVoice

    Who is the utmost authority on quantum potentialities? I'd be very interested to see what truth the mathematics is revealing... rather than just a tool to predict a margin of probability. So far what I've read about things like bell's theorem they can't explain the hidden variables... they can however predict a margin of probability. It's very useful but the truth is still occluded.

    Comment Hidden ( show )