Is it normal to stay with the one you need because the one you love isn't available?

Let's say you love X, but realistically X isn't ever going to be available to you for some reason (is gay, married, significant age difference, lives on the other side of the world, etc.). Under such circumstances, you settle for Y, who is wonderful in many ways, and probably what you need in life (for reasons of stability), but although you feel infinite affection for Y you're not truly in love with him/her. Given that you don't want anyone but X, leaving Y to find someone else seems pointless, because 'someone else' won't be X either, and is unlikely to be as good for you as Y is. In that scenario, would it be normal to settle for Y?

And (perhaps answer this one separately) what if you had kids with Y before you even met X?

Voting Results
80% Normal
Based on 20 votes (16 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 20 )
  • yesnomaybeso

    Done that, didn't end up great, I ended up realising I couldn't keep it up anymore, I also realised I hurt person Y, and X was still unavailable, and being with someone to forget X was stupid, I had to forget X on my own first.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • yesnomaybeso

      I was sure I could never have anything like I did with X for about two years. I now realise I will, I just haven't found my real X. Who is gonna make me realise my other X wasn't the one.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • What if you go into old age realizing that Y was lovely and you were really lucky to have him/her, and that someone as special as X was a rarity that most people never have?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • yesnomaybeso

          I was with my Y for about two years. He was lovely, nice. He was amazing for me. He was everything I could ask for. But, I just didn't feel it. I wasn't in love with Y like I was with X.

          And, yes, Y was perfect, and It could've worked. But I would have been wondering "what if" for the rest of my life. I dont think I would've been truly happy. When I was with X, I had no doubt whatsover that he was the right one. With Y, I did. I also knew he was great, but I had this little voice in my head. So I think I did the right thing. Y deserves someone who thinks of them the same way I thought of X. And I am pretty sure that I wouldn't' have been happy in the future.

          And as for me, I still remember how I felt with X. But I also believe that there isn't "THE ONE". You create this. You fall in love, and you think they are the one. And I know that I'm still young and I will find my real X. The one who is available, the one that I love too much that it hurts and scares me. The one that I could spend a whole year with him in an island, on our own, and I wouldn't mind.

          It wasn't easy letting Y go, but I know that I did the right thing.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
        • Tealights

          You need to let go of your obsession.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Youngvictoria

    If X is unavailable, then X should not even be a factor to consider here. The real question is about Y. Don't compare Y to X, consider Y on his/her own--- what is it about Y that makes you hesitate, other than that he/she is not X? Not knowing all the details, my instinct says stay with Y, things don't sound bad and you have kids. But I don't know all tbe details.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Just to make things even more complicated, X is a friend of a relative of Y and lives in a different country. Hence leaving Y would certainly mean never seeing X again.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Tealights

    Settling is the worse thing you can do.

    1. You don't love who you're with. If one day X were to go, "I would date you, but you have someone already," you would probably dump Y in a heartbeat. That's fucked up, and shows how pointless the relationship was from the start, so why bother? Loneliness? He/She is "good" to you? She/he is what you "need"? All pathetic excuses to use someone to fill your own void, when you can solve these feelings on your own if you tried.

    2. You wont cherish him/her as much as they deserve. Your dissatisfaction will show, especially if you're still keeping in contact with X, and watching their progress in life; including their relationships. For example, if X were to get a new haircut and look super cute with it, you may (without realizing it) suggest to the warm-body (the person you're "dating") to get the same haircut. You'll probably do a lot of things that will indicate that the person you're dating just isn't good enough compared to the person you're obsess with, and believe me, that person will noticed more than you think he/she would.

    3. It's a waste of time for you and for the person you're dating. Unless you're an expert actor, and can act for years, the relationship will eventually come to an end. Either you're going to get tired of pretending to love this person and being in a loveless relationship, or she/he will; and that could take months or years depending on how oblivious or in denial your partner is about the situation, or how much you want to hold on to this pointless relationship.

    It's best to stay single, and sort though your feelings for X; even call X for closure (confess or whatever). If dating X still impossible, then you need to work on getting over him/her, and accepting that it's not going to happen. There are billions of people in the world, and we're all compatible with at least a couple thousand in any given city, she may feel like "the one," but realistically, you have many opportunities to fall in love again if you allow yourself. So go through the motions. It could take months, or years depending on whether or not you're ready to let go of this obsession.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • pantaloonz

    I hate math, but since you asked

    if
    (x + y)2 = x2 + 2xy + y2

    then you should probably just give up.

    -Pantz

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • I won't be squaring either of them, and I've only multiplied with one of them, so hopefully I'm fine.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Nobody "needs" anyone. If you feel like you need someone that is a sign you need to work on yourself.

    It seems X is out of the question.
    Keep them as a friend but move on.
    If Y isn't satisfing maybe you need to move on and look for Z.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • 'Need' is perhaps not the best choice of word.

      And I don't want to look for Z because Z isn't X. Which is something I'll have to get over in due course, but that isn't going to happen quickly, and while it hasn't happened, it would seem silly to leave Y and start the search. I'm not unhappy or uncomfortable with Y.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • True, but kids are involved, and that's another form of love that trumps romantic love by a long way. And X certainly isn't 'some nice piece of ass', for which I wouldn't dream of leaving Y in a million years. X has merely shown me that what I thought to be romantic love (because I had never felt something so strong before) was merely an insipid version of it. When X came into the picture it was like a chemical reaction that didn't need to be catalysed.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Why does it say 10 comments and yet I can only see 5 (now 6, with this one)?

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • It's a possibility I'm alert to, but the point is that X is the one I want. That may change in 10 years, if I ever meet somebody I can love in the same way, but it doesn't alter the question of whether it would be sensible to settle for Y or perhaps go it alone.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • BlackCatsAreAwesome

    Yeah I guess I've already settled rather than stayed alone at times.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • shuggy-chan

    x=y^2

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Tealights

      That's cute lol

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • shuggy-chan

        I try :)

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Ratmanforelife

    Didn't Stephan Stills write a song about this back in the seventies?

    Comment Hidden ( show )