Is it normal to feel that extending the acrinyms to lbgtqia is hilarious?
Quick disclaimer: not trying to ridicule the individuals nor what label they choose to stick on their preferences, but grouping so many different viewpoints into one actually making them more "hetro" than the "straight" people?
Remember, the origin of homosexual or heterosexual stems from being comprised of "all the same gender" and the latter of "both genders". Now that "both genders" thing is actually not implied, rather "not all the same gender". (The bisexual label is more defining as that actually defines there are simply 2 sexes)
Seems to me that simple "man with a woman" sexual preference is turning out to be more of a homogeneous thing than the very complex and heterogeneous set of the "non straight".
Isn't it starting to become a farce? I admit that "we straights" (for the lack of better word) used to be the first to label the "non straights" but these days it seems like those with more complex sexual preferences are trying their hardest label themselves and make it even more confusing for them who already were probably confused to start with.
If all this sounds like almost a joke post it is probably because the whole thing itself is turning into a joke itself imho. (and I expect getting called an idiot again or whatever, but seriously, why not let everyone fuck whomever they want and lets all get along without all the labeling and the non-straight oriented people seeking a limiting identity to stick themselves into?)
| Yes the acronym is becoming a farce (and I am straight) | 29 | |
| Yes the acronym is becoming a farce (and I am not straight) | 14 | |
| No, the acronym should grow to fit the list (and I am straight) | 5 | |
| No, the acronym should grow to fit the list (and I am not straight) | 4 |