Is it normal to ask random strangers on the internet if [x] is normal?

Seriously peoples. How many people will I actually need to respond in order to achieve an adequate sample of "normality"?

Indeed,what is the minimum number of responses I would need to give me a reasonable certainty that the consensus of majority voters indeed accurate reflects what the majority of what society construes as "normality"? How would self-selection bias and sampling bias be eliminated?

Voting Results
60% Normal
Based on 30 votes (18 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 6 )
  • Crow

    That depends.

    Do you want "normality" defined as "normal to the average American man" or "normal to the average person on this planet"? The broader your scope, the less accurate your answers will get (especially considering cultural practices).

    Self-selection bias and sampling bias are practically impossible to eliminate on a domain like this. Your overwhelming majority of respondents will be well off enough to possess their own electronic devices and must be at least proficient in English. You can't really force people to answer whether or not certain behaviours are normal, so self-selection bias is always going to be a factor.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • CreamPuffs

    Not normal.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Daisychain1

    And then you can also read other posts and weigh up what's said and what bits might be even remotely true and what you DO come to realize is that there's a hell of a lot of weird thinking in the world and feel a whole lot better about your own little worries. That's how it works for me.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • ogrelord

    normal is a social construction that in the end is meaningless

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • pantychaffe

      Your answer is every thing!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • mrbrownfinger5

    Did you know hamsters die after sex. Well it did with me.

    Comment Hidden ( show )