Iin, that i think it's ridiculous to call cancer patients "warriors"?
I mean seriously... these people aren't "warriors." They don't have bulging muscles like the Rock did in "The Scorpion King", they don't walk around with broadswords and battle-axes, and their destiny isn't to "wear the jeweled crown of Aquilonia upon a troubled brow."
What they ARE is terrified unfortunates, who are SUBMITTING themselves to painful, weakening, mutilating, and unreliable treatments for the financial benefit of others. Indeed, if they weren't mostly SHEEP (rather than "warriors") they'd be heading to Mexico or Germany for suppressed-in-America procedures which are far less destructive to their bodies than the radiation/surgery/chemo pushed on them by mainstream American doctors. Meanwhile, the drug companies laugh all the way to the bank while they make sure their barbaric poisons are the only choice most Americans get, and the insurance companies refuse to pay for anything else (even if it's 10x cheaper than the mainstream options.)
In light of all this, it's silly to call most cancer patients "warriors." Scared, easily gulled "sheep" is more appropriate IMHO.