Is it normal that i believe these types of relationships should be legalized?

Love knows bounds if you're into bondage. In fact, it knows many bounds indeed.

I forgot my damn safe word.

Um, define child please?? Dafuq? I don't give a shit about the others but adult child??? No. No. No.

I sort of agree with incestual relationships. Some of them. I mean, the scientific reasoning against it is that their babies will have a higher chance of deformity but, if that's the case, shouldn't we ban relationships between those who're born with genetic diseases as well? Diseases which have a high chance of being spread of their children? Plus, what about homosexual incest? What harm do they do if both parties are okay with it?

...Most of the stuff against incestual relationships seems to be social. It's just socially wrong. Socially unacceptable. All that stuff.

NO, NO, NO!!!!! You sicko! You are absolutely demented, much like Pope Benedick. That guy, like you, supported pedophilia. He said that the relationship between a child and a grown ass man was a special one indeed. I don't believe in hell, but if it exists, I hope that there are reserved seats for you, him and anyone else that agrees with child abuse. Get psychiatric counselling, you sick fiend.

I hope you and your brother, the minor goat, are very happy together.

Oh, I agree! Let's just turn back the clock about 10,000 years and revert to being animals.
Society has imposed some rules for the protection of the weak and helpless and others because of actual scientific knowledge. But hey, that's just stupid, right, because some guys can't get laid by an intelligent adult, so let's let them fuck any damn thing they can.
I truly wonder if, without religion, whether society would have developed it's homophobia, which I believe is totally absurd. But gays are consenting adults not inbred idiots, like the OP wants to create.
I suppose you also think every father should be the one to introduce their (female AND male) children to sex?

Well if you think about it bestiality is rape. The animal can not give you verbal consent so you are raping them. Sex without consent is RAPE and should be illegal. Its like sex with a child which can not legally give consent. Since a child is too easily manipulated.

So its still rape. I do not believe in sex with someone/something that can not give you consent. So No RAPE IS WRONG! WITH ANY SPECIES!

I am also sure if you tried to fuck an animal it might retaliate and bite or kill you.<=== Going to say what I said on the other pro Bestiality post.

heterosexual and gay thats cool i have no problem with incestual is pushing it but what ever makes you happy but adult child and cross species absoultly not thats just sick

Actually I was thinking "Oh, another dumb post," specifically because I knew you were serious.

All marriage should be illegal. It is an outdated idea.

All of this is why angry mobs with pitchforks and torches are still a great thing!

Yeah..........I'm sure that goat really has a choice in the matter, and the eleven year old marrying the sixty year old man is jumping with joy.

It's not that difficult to find non related women and men to fornicate with. Just go to applebees during happy hour.

Child of what age? Because I can never feel comfortable with an adult having sex with an 8 year old. I don't agree with the beastality thing, either, because I can see an animal getting hurt in the act of someone trying to have sex with it or the other way around (the guy that tried to have sex with a horse a few years ago, if anyone remembers). I'm kind of on the fence about the whole incest thing. I mean, as long as it's two adults, I guess it's alright. And it's like lolol55 said if we ban them for possible deformities in children then we might as well ban people with genetic diseases from having sex as well. I guess it just doesn't sit right with me, but that's just my opinion and I guess it shouldn't interfere with other people lives. But children and animals...no!

Straight and gay marriage is fine with me,
but the others? Yeah, no.

Um...I think that bestiality and the adult/child relationship should remain out-lawed. I don't really see the issue in gay marriage, and incest....well that's a double-edged sword in my opinion. I don't see a problem having a sexual relationship with a distant collateral relative (example: second cousin, 1st cousin ONCE removed, third cousin, grandaunt/granduncle, ect) because there isn't usually a lot of genetic overlap between this type of relative and you (between 1/8 genetic overlap to almost nonexistent) because you and this relative only share a common ancestor and that could be anywhere from great-grandparents to great-great-great-grandparents ect. also genetic overlap tends to dilute 50% for every generation before/after yours due to genetic recombination. Now, the incest that I DO NOT particularly approve of is direct relative incest (example: father, mother, siblings (1/2 or full), aunts, uncles, first cousins, double first cousins, grandparents ect) because there isn't a whole lot of genetic overlap dilution from these generations (you share 1/2 of your genetic overlap with your parents, 1/2 with full-blooded siblings, 1/4 genetic overlap with half-siblings/aunts/uncles/grandparents ect). Also, who in their right mind would want to have sex with their mom or their dad or their brother/sister BY CHOICE? I understand that there are a lot of victims out there who were sexually assaulted out there by either a parent or other close relative during childhood or some other point in life, and I know that it wasn't the victims choice.

"As long as no one's harmed in one of the relationships and both members love each other, then nothing should stop them from being together."

In theory I agree with this. The question, for which I do not have an answer, is whether those cases are so rare that it's an acceptable loss to outlaw it completely.

So you think that fathers raping their daughters, people having sex with their dogs, and old men touching little kids is alright?

What the fuck is wrong with you?

Straight marriage? Sure.
Gay marriage? Yep.
Incestual? Okay.
Cross-species? Doesn't really make sense in terms of the definition of marriage. From a juridical perspective, marriage is for taxes and stuff. Doesn't apply for other species.
Adult-child? Critical. Can easily be misused.

Is it normal to be an absolute degenerate?

Gays opened up the gates to all this sickness. Now all the other degenerates are asking for their "rights" too...

I agree with counterfeit. circus and the postet 94% or so