Is it normal (or ethical) for a company to employ someone based on their asd?
This is going to be pretty detailed, due to the complex nature of the context, so try to keep up:
I'm someone who was diagnosed with AS/ASD at 15 (I'm now 32)and I'm employed at a clinic for people with ASD, which I acquired through an ASD-related agency program. The program had a placement where the agency found jobs for its participants (which they covered via reimbursement for the company), but permanent employment was not guaranteed. Some went on to find permanent work, others did not. However, I'm fairly certain all the participants who were accepted by my clinic were permanently employed there, for obvious reasons. The thing is, all of them (myself included) are only allowed to work part-time and don't have any official titles, instead mostly doing "odd jobs" and menial labour work ussually assigned for volunteers and/or placement students (these indivduals are no longer on placement, however, and are supposed to be regular employees now).
I don't really like my job, though (basically receptionist) and I feel like I can accomplish way more than what I'm currently doing and can handle more responsibility. Problem is, I don't think anyone wants to give anyone from those programs more responsibility because they're essentially employing them due to the fact that it's good PR for them. I've been assured that my position is as important as any other, but I know that most of these jobs were just created to keep people like me employed for the minimal requirement. Case in point, the jobs we have were never officially posted externally for applicants, no one else applied for them (so no competition), and they were not previously filled by anyone else (except, as mentioned, volunteers/placement students working for free). We were simply given these jobs immediately after our resumes were submitted to the company and told that they had "just opened up".
Sorry to ramble on, but it just kinda irritates me to be marginalized like this, especially when I'm being told that's not the case. I've even been told that my having AS is irrelevant and that no one even notices it or perceives me any differently, therefore, marginilization couldn't possibly be happening, which I know can't be true. These are people TRAINED to deal with ASD, and most individuals on the spectrum have difficulty finding employment due to being perceived negatively by employers- if some meathead managing a laundromat or convenience store can notice it, why shouldn't someone who specializes in it be able to? Hell, even elementary school kids target other kids with ASD because it's so obvious they're different- so hearing specialists tell me they don't see me as being any different is a load of BS, in my opinion. How did I get the diagnosis in the first place if I'm the same as a neurotypical?
So, the question remains: do you think it's ethical for ASD individuals to be employed by these types of places that aren't being completely honest with them about why they're there? It certainly isn't due to their skills, even though technically any one of them could be doing much more. Many of them have backgrounds in accounting, IT, business etc. and are just as qualified as anyone else to advance in any company, but most places won't even hire them because of their "disability", which, oftentimes, only amounts to some strange aesthetic issue (ie. monotone voice, awkward body language, lack of facial expression) that makes others uncomfortable socially around them but does not affect their ability to do their jobs whatsoever. In other words, it's basically prejudice and discrimination, bordering on bigotry. It's possible I just sound like a whining ingrate, considering I'm still getting a paycheck from a place that hired me and kept me unconditionally when no other place would, but I'm just looking at the bigger picture. I don't want to stay in a place where I feel like I'm being used to further someone else's agenda.
*Note: I have not spoken to any other ASD employess about this matter- this is based purely on my perception shaped by what I have experienced as an employee. It is possible they feel the same way, but if they don't, I feel like it would be somewhat irresponsible of me to bring it up if they are happy with their role in the company, whatever reason they may have.