Ask Your Question today
I just learned about foreskin restoration where you keep whatever skin you have left under tension for like 8 hours a day, and like ear gauges, it slowly causes new skin to grow. Not an actual foreskin, but a function replacement.
I was wondering what people thought, or if they knew it was even an option.
Uncircumcised does give far more pleasure that circumcised. This days is common knowledge.
Even some Jewish are ending it.
Definitely a mutilation. For religious reasons its absurd like anything else done to the body for religious things. Primitive.
There is always the risk that the surgery might result in less sensitivity, i.e., nerve damage. Then there is surgical recovery. You would have to strictly adhere to an subjective time table. Afterwards there is the time required for the alteration to have any real benefit. Just guessing, I am thinking 2-3 months on the safe side. You probably would need to avoid getting erections for a time, as well. Then there is the issue of scarring, which could be the surgeons fault or yours depending on wound care. The scarring might not look good for 6 months to years. And then your crotch is like a bacterial infection factory. You might want to read up on what the piercings community has to say. They probably have more below the belt wound recovery experience that you surgeon.
If you are single, this will definitely put a dent in your sex life for a while and you had better already be pretty successful with women to even think this is a worthwhile way to spend your money.
Orgasms can be great but what makes most orgasms great has a lot more to do with what is happening in your head than to your penis. You should at least explore Viagra or ways of increasing the pleasure to your frenulum during intercourse before doing anything more risky.
I completely agree with you on the risks of a surgery, that's why I am taking about non-surgical restoration. It's explained above. Most of the effect it has is actually from the head repairing itself now that it has protection and no longer needs thick, callused skin to do so. I have tried a knock off Viagra by the way. They do what is advertised: Make you hard, but they don't do anything for sensitivity.
Fuck there's a lot of people here obsessed with circumcision being mutilation & whatnot. I never realised it was such a big deal to people.
OP, had never heard of this & personally wouldn't consider it but if you're going to then you need to look at the risks involved & how it will compare to not having ever been circumcised which will be tricky.
I wouldn't think it would be quite the same.
Without being a cunt, what do you mean it penis isn't sensitive enough?
Compared to what?
It's a valid question, I can't know what other guys feel first hand, but at this point I have to force myself to cum from intercourse. And it wasn't always at difficult as it is now, I just really don't feel a whole lot during it. I started to think there might be some truth to it when I tried exfoliating down there and got enough sensitivity back to notice the difference.
And no, you can't grow back any nerves that have been cut away, but supposedly the difference between cut and restored is pretty huge. I'm more concerned with that then the difference between restored and uncut, as I can't do much about that.
Thanks for your input, I will do some more research on the risks involved.
Don't know if this is any good:
http://www.restoringforeskin.org
Find out disadvantages of the procedure and other types of procedure and non surgical options.
I understand your concern but realize, messing with it may make things even worse.
Supposedly similar, because you can't grow the nerves of the foreskin back, but the protection to the glans lets them repair back to the way they are supposed to be. I'm thinking about it for that reason, I'm pretty sure I'm not where I should be sensitivity wise
Do whatever you want to. If it actually does work It might not end up looking completely normal tho..
For me it's because I'm not nearly as sensitive as I want to be or think I should be at my age. I was researching why that could be and learned that your glans are supposed to be so sensitive that your pants rubbing against it is uncomfortable, but without the protection it has to grow thicker skin, which unlike foreskin, dulls any sensation, 24/7.
To me circumcision is nothing but mutilation when done to innocent babies. IF an adult wants to do it- Fine.
It is true what you say, it's supposed to be REALLY sensitive and react to even the smallest touch just as a woman's clitoris is.
Good luck!
Pretty much. Guys who restored claim that if it gets uncovered and starts rubbing on your pants directly its irritating to the point you have to fix it.
I live in Sweden and around here it's uncommon. Guys wear boxers but we DO have a thing with them sticking their hands down their pants a lot to adjust their junk xD