I think all children should be brought up in a commune.

I am serious about this, so please don't just say I'm nuts. I don't think children having parents in their own home is healthy. A lot of parents are borderline abusive, if not full blown abusive and rather than you being able to just cut them off or report them, you feel entangled by them because of their bond with you. I just think families are unhealthy places for children. Children have very little rights, and don't know their rights. They are also unhealthy places for mothers. Not only that, but children will behave in unhealthy ways, like having too much dependance on their mothers, or manipulating their parents. Parents are often resentful to their children for the responsibility and worry. Why do we all accept that children have to be brought up by 'parents?' I think it would be better if they were brought up by caring adults in a group environment. Then there would be no excessive responsibility to an individual carer, no manipulation by the children as they are loved but not in an unconditional way, no resentment, no abuse as the carers' actions are observed and moderated, unless the carers are dodgy which is unfortunately going to be hard to stamp out altogether. And I don't need to know if it's normal, just what you think about this.

Voting Results
32% Normal
Based on 38 votes (12 yes)
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 20 )
  • Legion

    you do realize abuse and neglect is even MORE likely when the person entrusted to their care doesn't have any personal connection to the kids.
    many families that leave all the care to a nanny typically end up with rotten kids cause the Nanny doesn't care to teach them to behave, their just there for the paycheck, and the parents are either too busy or don't care, so they never talk to their kids.

    sure, there are parents who are abusive twats, but barring them, its the most stable foundation for a kid growing up. the parents have an attachment to the kid, so they are (likely) going to do what they can to make sure their kid grows up to be a good responsible adult.

    teenage "rebellion" is a typical part of growing up. they are distancing themselves, from their parents and starting to act for themselves.

    now, yes, some may "rebel" more than others if the parents are particularly strict, but even they will typically calm down by about age 18 -20.

    many kids who grow up in broken homes, foster families (usually if they go through more than one family) , and the like
    (with some exceptions) tend to be aimless, and maybe detached towards others, and at worst, likely to engage in criminal behaviors, cause they didn't have a parental figure that was around long enough in their lives to give them support.

    the point is, kids growing up need a strong pillar of support, and their parents are usually the best for this.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Darkoil

    What a stupid fucking idea.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • You're a stupid fucking idea.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • HoneyBadgerChic

        You're mom making you was a bad idea

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • Darkoil

        I still think your idea is retarded but now I think your a cunt as well, well done.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • thegypsysailor

    If you did a bit of research, you would find that there are more than a few cultures that have raised their children in a communal way, historically. Your idea is not at all unique or silly, for that matter, but a very effective way of raising homogenized children that grow up to be integrated members of their communities, without a creative or independent thought.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • And I know it's not unique, I have heard of it before.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • I don't see why they wouldn't have a creative or independent thought...unless their upbringing brainwashes them. But brainwashing goes on to some extent in every upbringing.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • CalciteQueen

    It's idealistic.

    What would probably happen is that the caregivers will get fed up with the massive number of children. They'll eventually be densensitised to giving loving nurture either that or they'll develop favorites.

    "Sibling" rivalry will probably occur in extreme forms. They'll be loner kids, 24 hour bullying etc.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • mrkrule

    Maybe this makes sense on the scale of a small community, but otherwise, fuck no. Imagine all the flaws of the public school system and foster care rolled into one. If you want to decrease the likelihood of child abuse going unnoticed, there are other routes to take other than ripping children away from their families. Also don't see how subjecting all children to one homogenized system from birth is doing anything to protect their rights. Who says the adult caretakers wouldn't abuse the kids? This happens in schools, daycares and orphanages a LOT. Gotta agree with Darkoil here: what a stupid fucking idea.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • reminiscent

    I dont really agree with you. Abuse can happen with your idea too its not a fix for abuse. There are great parents out there not every family abuses their children. Yes it can happen but if you see or suspect abuse you should report it... being aware is the best solution.
    really the best way to grow up is to have a primary caregiver and family support...thats your small group the family should help...watch the kids a few times a month to give parents a break. Your grandpa could be the one to teach you to fish, your dad teaches you about computers, your mom helps you with reading and math, and your grandma teaches you her best recipes...just as examples.

    But I could never do your idea. I want my baby around me the most. I refused to get a babysitter or daycare until she could talk...because if something was wrong I wanted her to be able to voice it. Having some group of people split responsibility is actually a scary thought for me and it takes away some of my joy. I want to be the only one fixing her lunch before school...I want to be the one to read to her most nights....and so on.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Well you sound like you'd be a wonderful parent, or are already. But I feel most people aren't.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • reminiscent

        Thank you I have a daughter.
        I learned from my mom who was a wonderful mom.
        I havent ran into too many bad parents

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Great, as if child molestation wasn't prevalent enough.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • It's not a bad idea but I do think parents have a responsibility as a primary care giver and shouldn't put the burden on people who didn't decide to have kids. Honestly I do not want to raise other peoples children.

    I do believe the government should have more regulation on who can have kids. Parents should be required to take parenting classes and have inspections. Many will argue this one but I also think ones who fail and lose their kids should be sterilized along with hardcore drug users, abusive people and sex offenders. There is no reason any of those types should have kids.
    Everyone should start with equal rights but if they fuck up you should lose rights regarding what you fucked up doing.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • green_boogers

      Why not have licensed parents? The penalty for having kids without a license is mandatory sterilization.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Eh? And why is your name so gross?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • green_boogers

          It is a genuine name designed to discourage communication with gullible people easily influenced by shallow advertising. God, I hate people that are unable to do critical thinking.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Broken homes?? What is that supposed to mean? Kids raised by a mother are probably better off, without their father beating them up.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
  • AmosTheCracker

    I think its a good idea. Children wouldn't be stuck with only two primary role models, which is good, because a lot of folks are stupid fuckers and shouldn't reproduce in the first place.

    Comment Hidden ( show )