I don't understand. why? it is not normal, right?
Why are people clammering to the moral understanding of people who lived thousands of years ago?
Wouldn't it be advisable to have a 21-century discussion on morality and ethics, without giving special focus to certain books? After all, we know for a fact that these books were written by people who merely by their placement in history knew less about the world than any of us do?
How do people claim that certain books are perfect, although we all know that they contain more inaccuracies and pure bullshit than Donald T., Vladimir P. and Bill C. together? Isn't it obvious that the notion about a certain book - especially if it is covering a variety of topics which develop over time - being infallible and perfect cannot possibly be true?
Would they still believe these books were perfect if it weren't hammered into their heads from early childhood on?
You're right. This kind of behaviour is crazy. | 5 | |
You're wrong. We need to go back to the x.th century. | 3 | |
*covers eyes and ears* lalala! My religion is perfect! | 0 |