How intelligent are you?

I'm intelligent enough to know I'm probably not the best one to judge how intelligent I am.

Ask me a question about farming.

Clearly NOT at the ivy league level.

I cannot vote on any of your options, OP for my intelligence consists of only air.

One of those options is not like the other (real).
Here is a question: is it intelligence to substitute your intelligence with Google or other such aides?

Wobbegongs a type of shark, sharks rule!

I'm not a vegetarian dingbat; I'm a meat-eating wingding.

Not too intelligent because I voted for the only one I recognized =\

Ones intelligence cannot be determined by the same person, it must be told to the person by another. Therefore, choosing a creature to compare yourself to is irrelevant, and illogical.

Fun fact, most people believe their IQ is above average.

No single celled organism can compare to my high level of stupidity.

These are all names of species that relate to stupidity. Not that the species itself is stupid but the names sound like insults given their unheard-of humorous nature. So asking someone to pick one of these will, in any given result, essentially end up in the person calling themselves stupid. However to distinguish myself as more "intelligent" it would be in my best interest to pick one that nobody else has, or at least, been picked the least. most people will pick platypus because its the most familiar on the list. A sweeping assumption would be that those people fall under the "average" intelligence part of the curve. Now that I know popularity will rule out average intelligence, the tricky part will be picking which "outlying" option. I cant pick randomly because I have a 50% chance of either ending up on the really high intelligence part of the curve or the really low intelligence part of the curve. Basic psychology tells us that a person who wanted to seem smart would assume that each animal has no actual distinction of intelligence and thus pick the one that sounded less dumb. of course thats a subjective observation but thats where popularity will once again play a role. "Dumbo Octopus" has the word "dumb" right in it. Which is why no one of either average or low intelligence picked it because they want to seem smarter. Of course, because the species reflects nothing about intelligence, me picking it would distinguish myself among the pool of subjects as the one who ACTUALLY realized this fact and put no stock in how a species could suggest intelligence. Thus by picking it, I would have made myself, in my own convoluted theory, more intelligent than everyone else. However in order to gather the data I needed to come to this conclusion I needed to "skip and view results". So I cant vote now and basically my ability to be the intelligent dumbo octopus is gone. but at the same time I dont have to worry about the no win situation of calling myself a silly name.

so it looks like I just outsmarted myself. I am dumber than I thought I wasn't. This... has been eye opening. *chugs bottle of bleach*

I want to be a Frilled Shark

But Alice would be a cowfish

And Kedders would be a vampire squid

I think common sense is a much better way to test intelligence than some silly IQ test. One relates to real life and the other just doesn't.

cephalopods are known for their remarkable intelligence...however, the dumbo octopus is a deep sea species, remarkably understudied...but ima go with that cause it looks all retarded, like me :)