Have you ever wept after a presidential election result?

For all of your talk about taking out emotions and thinking logically, your post sure has a whole lot of emotion and not much logic. Your belief that women would continue to follow up on their accusations is an emotional one, not a logical one. Logically, if they were going to pursue a criminal case, they would've done that already. So, logically, why are they bringing it up now? Logically, to stop their rapist or attempted rapist from becoming President or a Supreme Court justice. Once the election is over and the Senate votes, logic dictates there's nothing else for them to pursue. It's over. It's weird that you would think they would continue to pursue it at this point.

Speaking of logic, why did you completely ignore the majority of my post? Specifically, where I pointed out that Donald Trump has admitted to doing what those women said he did and bragged about getting away with it. Logically, that shows you know that they're telling the truth. If you really wanted to apply logic to the Kavanaugh/Ford situation, you would look at the fact that Kavanaugh was caught lying under oath multiple times and while Ford was as honest as she could be every time she spoke. Logically, that tells you she has more credibility that he does. If you wanted to apply logic, you would look at the fact that the investigation made no attempt to actually investigate the allegations by talking to anybody who knew both of them at the time, including the one person who could directly support Ford's claim and several other people who could make or support similar claims. If you were thinking logically, the only logical conclusion is that they wanted to hide the truth. But you aren't thinking logically, you're thinking emotionally.

The reality is that those women were telling the truth. Anybody can see that. Nobody actually believes they were lying. But your emotional response, anger over the nerve of these women to stand up to such powerful men, causes you to lash out with baseless accusations and twisted logic in a vein attempt to discredit them and discourage other women from coming forward. You expect it to work, just like you expect your attempts to manipulate readers into believing you're not thinking emotionally will work.

And finally, since we're on the topic of logic, it's illogical to be anti-Sharia Law yet also be a conservative, which your comment history shows you are. There's no substantive difference between Sharia Law and the "religious freedom" that conservatives preach. The only difference between the Middle East and the United States is that there are more secularists in the United States preventing conservative Christians from implementing the exact same anti-women and anti-gay laws they have in the Middle East. This is another fact that you can't deny, because it wasn't that long ago that conservative Christians had a lot more control over the US government and those laws were in place...women couldn't work, go to school, vote, or drive in the not too distant past...gay people had no rights in the very recent past...and conservative Christians weren't the ones who changed the laws. They've fought it every step of the way. You would know all of this if you looked at it logically, but your fear of people who don't look or sound like you clouds your judgment and politicians like Trump manipulate you and exploit that fear in their favor.