Ask Your Question today
Does it feel different having sex with a circumcised guy and an uncircumcised guy? If so, how is it different?
| Yes, the sex is better with a circumcised guy. | 16 | |
| Yes, the sex is worse with a circumcised guy. | 13 | |
| No, the sex is about the same. | 18 | |
| Other comments | 2 |
I don't feel any difference. But circumcised dicks smell better than uncircumcised.
Ive read the replies to your comment and i guess there's lots of uncircumcised frustrated virgins trolling on IIN these days. :D
I don't think smell would be down to circumcision, but rather to hygiene.
I also don't think those cunts had any right to comment on their imagination of your sexlife because of their own inferiority.
I can't say I've been upclose and personal with both sides of the fence, but I still think it is down to the individual's hygiene, rather than circumcision.
I'm certain that there are some incidences of smelly circumcised ones. Precisely because their owners don't wash.
That or some disease, same as some women, I guess.
Also, I like your profile pic :) pretty :)
I don't see why these people feel they need to attack you for saying what you think.
I wouldn't see why unless the uncircumcised people you have had sex with don't wash their member correctly.
/Me imagines you going around smelling a LOT of crotches.
On the upside you win this weeks prize for 'stupid and baseless comment'
I think you spend too much time with dogs.. lmao
:) I think my comment answered the question and I gave my opinion. However yours seems pretty irrelevant.
No reason to be so offended you must be very insecure about your Penis. Have a good day sir.
Good for you.
I don't actually spend any time with dogs, I merely pointed out that to form an opinion such as yours, you need necessarily to have sniffed a lot of penises.
I still don't know how you would come to the conclusion that there is a difference in smell unless you had taken a scientific approach and sampled a realistic and varied cross section of society.
Where you get the idea I am insecure or offended also eludes me.
I have had sex with a total of 6 guys in my lifetime so far. Most of them were circumscribed, 2 were not. Those 2 had a different smell than the others did. And no i did not go up to their crotch and sniff it, when you preform oral sex on a person their scent is something you notice.
You called me stupid for giving my opinion? Why are you so mad unless you're offended by my comment. Hence you're insecure with yourself. Bye now.<3
Uncircumcised phallus's require more maintenence then a circumcised penis. I'm a guy and I think it's gross. But I think a penis should be washed as many times as you wash your hands period.
Lol... apparently the guys you've been with felt like they needed to wash less because they have no foreskin.
No worries I wash my member and I'm happily cut.
Yes, circumcised guys have PTSD because they were mutilated by their parents when they were babies.
Lol, I hope this is sarcasm.. cause if not..
an infant is scientifically incapable of remember an experience of pain even in the sub conscious. The brain is not developed to retain the memory.
I'm not in support of circumcision on infants. If a guy needs it done for medical reasons then I support that, it needs to be done. If a guy wants it done when he is an adult and can make that decision himself then I support that too. I may find it weird but I support it.
However I haven't heard of this PTSD thing. It may be true but I think it seems a bit odd. Do you have links to it? Not saying you're lying but I would prefer to know. Does it happen to most people who were circumcized as infants or just increased the chances?
This tool is always on every circumcision convo on here he used to say circumcision led to autism until I got his facts straight for him. You could have the same amount of hygiene between circumcised and uncircumcised and the uncircumcised would have more of a smell the skin folds trap moisture which breeds bacteria what better atmosphere for bacteria to flourish than moist warm dark places think for a moment people or stfu thank you.
"Every circumcision convo."
- No. I go through multiple topics on here and this subject is more interesting than others. However to say I'm on every convo of the topic is inaccurate.
"He used to say circumcision led to autism until I got his facts straight for him."
- Eh, first off I said it once and I admit I was wrong. Secondly, piss of with the part about you getting my facts right. That wasn't you, it was another user. You simply denied it, another user showed me I was wrong.
"Would have more of a smell."
- Unless you don't wash it properly.
"Think for a moment people or stfu thank you."
- Dude, you're not a big player on the discussion. Infact it took someone else who agrees circumcision should not be performed on kids to actually prove me wrong on something. You offered nothing in that discussion.
You're not smart. You're not insightful. And if you think you're going to be able to get me to shut up then you have another thing coming...Because you just don't have the ability to make that possible. Cunt. ^_^
The children that your trying to protect are probably not that vigilant about cleaning their dicks which is why UTI's yeast infections and many other infections are prevalent in children that aren't circumcised and with adults female partners of uncircumcised men also have a significantly higher risk of acquiring the same infections the fact that penile cancer is practically eradicated by circumcision but oh yes the poor infants that don't remember the small surgery and are better for it at least health wise .your soapbox is made of cardboard and it's raining facts and logic and btw yes I really am hot shit thank you go pick a fight u might have a chance of winning.
Then it's a case of children should be taught more on how to do it and if they're at a young age their parents should be doing it.
About the infection. Again. Condoms.
"But oh yes, the poor infants that are dead due to the procedure of circumcision."
- I like how you missed that part out.
Oh, fuck off. That shit is hilarious. You're going to come at me about facts and logic when you're disregarding what you can't refute and you're repeating yourself? You argued against ONE point in our previous discussion on this and were unable to to even address the rest and you somehow think you won that? Are you retarded? Do you need to be told that defeating one point does not win you the discussion if there are more points to refute?
Yeah, hot shit in the literal sense perhaps. "You go pick a fight you might have a chance of winning."
- Already did. You lost. The fact that you couldn't even address everything I said to you and had to ignore parts of what I said demonstrate that. ;)
First I was the one to point out the study that you quoted was conducted by a man that is on the record as being against circumcision as well as pointing out that autism rates are increasing while circumcision rates drop. That was me that told you don't get shit twisted. You cherry picked info that you didn't even fact check. Now please refute the fact that the skin of a uncircumcised penis is a much better environment for bacteria to grow than a circumcised penis then learn how quickly bacteria grows in such environments you will find I'm right and your a prick with an agenda to push so suck my beautiful circumcised cock.
No, you did not refute the link that was given, you merely made statements in opposition without addressing the actual link I provided like the other user did.
Not to mention you ONLY argued against one point I made against circumcision and just so happened to disregard the many other points I brought forward. So you cherry picked which points you addressed, which was just one, and left out the others. Even with that one point proven wrong you still had the rest of the list to go through, which you didn't.
Even if bacteria grew in those places more you're disregarding the fact that we live in an age where cleaning the penis is extremely easy.
"You're a prick with an agenda."
- Welldone. You fuckin' got me. I don't want kids to have their genitals mutilated at birth without their consent. How fucking pricky of me, you unbelivable toss pot.
I get it. You think that because your peepee got cut without your consent that everyone elses should, because you think if you have it then everyone else should have it. You're not the hot shit you think you are, and the fact you have something or had something taken does not mean that experience has value.
No thanks, hon. You're not my type. People with cliche responses like "suck my cock" just don't do it for me.
I'll add this in as an added bonus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCSWbTv3hng
Not true, I had to be circumcised due to a medical condition when I was very little. I assure you it did not leave me with PTSD or were I "mutilated"
tiny grammar mistake:
you ought to have said "... with PTSD nor were I "mutilated"".
P.S. I agree with you, I was circumcised just like you were and don't remember a thing about it.
P.P.S. always better to get it done when a baby, rather than as an adult like the Egyptian priests did.
So you're ok if a guy gets hard before the foreskin gets pulled back and it tears and bleeds everywhere. Hmmm. Either the guys with the turtlenecks didn't have good insurance or the Rabbi was on vacation. Disclosure: got an awesome cut at birth and my gf cringes at this question.
I wouldn't know, but supposedly having an intact foreskin prevents irritation caused by friction from the coronal ridge.
Its interesting that circumcision of a man is supported but the similar thing to a woman is not.
Its mutilation in both cases and about time it was stopped on a purely 'custom' basis, supported by bullshit ideas that it is better for any reason.
Female genital mutilation can't be compared to circumcision except that both are mutilations of the sexual organs of young children by adults.
FGM is designed to remove all possibility of sexual pleasure and is often done in unhygeinic conditions, resulting in illness and sometimes death. It also causes medical complications later in life, especially in childbirth.
Male circumcision started as a cultural thing to distinguish certain cultures from others and it's about time it was abandoned except for medical reasons.
That was the comparison I was making, that it is just mutilation, as you say FGM is done for the reason you state, which is where the difference lies.
However there are also cases of unhygienic conditions and of boys bleeding to death where this has been done in primitive conditions as you outline above.