Do you argue with logos or pathos?

When considering one's argument, one of the most important things to consider is one's modes of persuasion. There are three modes of persuasion: Logos (appeals to a person's intellect), Pathos (appeals to a person's emotions), and Ethos (which is essentially establishing one's own credibility).

All people use Ethos, it is nigh a requirement for an effective persuasive argument. If one does not establish oneself as a credible source of information, then their argument is rendered invalid, since it cannot be known whether or not they know what they are talking about.

The real difference lies in Logos and Pathos. Some people use one exclusively, but most put in a mix of both, to appeal to all listeners.

I personally use Logos far more than Pathos, only using the latter for audience considerations.

Which one do you use more often? If you have something to say about this poll, or have a relevant experience you would like to share, feel free to leave a comment.