Do or are you with a agreement with having a abortion!!!

14 Comments

I'm Totally Against It Baby Killers In My* Opinion...*

Strongly Agree 18
Strongly Not Agree 8
Murder 10
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 14 )
  • howaminotmyself
    9 years ago

    Oh please. Get off your soap box. Or, at least stop typing like you are standing on one.

    I bet you don't even know how one works.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    4
    4
  • VinnyB
    9 years ago

    Then don't have one.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    3
    3
  • thegypsysailor
    9 years ago

    I have absolutely zero respect for people like you who flap their gums but do absolutely nothing more. When you have adopted at least one unwanted baby, I will have an enormous amount of respect for your opinion on this matter, but until then don't be calling others names like baby killers, because you have no right to speak up.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    2
    2
  • charli.m
    9 years ago

    Yeah, cos we wouldn't want to abort any future geniuses like you...

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    1
    1
  • Cuntsiclestick
    9 years ago

    Abortion posts have been done here before, OP.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
  • HardHeadKoopa
    9 years ago

    I think women should have every right to an abortion. Yes, while the fetus is 'technically' alive, it's only in a state of "pre-existiental Limbo" (not dead, but not quite alive-alive either) until it's born. The living woman's needs and wants should matter more and always come first in my honest opinion.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
  • SecretIdentity
    9 years ago

    If you don't like abortion then don't do it but try to realize the value in affording others the choice.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
  • [Old Memory]
    9 years ago

    Meeeeeh. It's a weird discussion. I'm all for abortion (and the male equivilent of it) but I can't really say I think pro-lifers are bad people. Maybe in my opinion they're a bit off the mark but they're people that thinks that every potential life deserves a chance.

    So although I disagree with pro-lifers, I can see that their position comes from a good place most of the time.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
    0
    0
      -
    • SecretIdentity
      9 years ago

      There is no "male equivalent" of an abortion. If you're talking about LPS, or financial abortion, that's a false equivalency. An ENORMOUS one. It's in no way equal, at all, ever. And women do not have the undeniable...unilateral...right to give up a living child either, if the father objects, so don't even try to go there.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
      0
      0
        -
      • [Old Memory]
        9 years ago

        I do believe that financial abortion is a true equivalency. How is it not?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
        0
        0
          -
        • SecretIdentity
          9 years ago

          In one scenario, no child exists. In the other, a child exists. Pretty major difference there!

          Comment Hidden ( show )
          0
          0
            -
          • [Old Memory]
            9 years ago

            Well, no. In the case of financial abortion the child wouldn't exist yet and the decision would be made at a time where the woman could also abort, so the decision is done before the child even exists.

            We could also go on to that if it's bad for someone to avoid parental responsibility then why is adoption a thing. Or that if the case is that the only reason a woman can abort is that it's her body, her choice and not the choice to avoid parental responsibility (we'll pretend adoption isn't a thing for this point), then if that's the case then a system where women can choose a right over her own body is acceptable (which I agree on), however she should not be made to avoid parental responsibility which then a child needing adopted would be given to such women. Giving women the right to abort while not allowing her to be releaved of parental responsibility, which in the long run would help kids find new homes.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
            0
            0
              -
            • SecretIdentity
              9 years ago

              The purpose of financial abortion is to legally relieve one of the financial obligation to support their own biological children, which then thrusts that responsibility onto others and deprives a child of its basic human right to support from its parents. The result of a medical abortion is that a child never comes to exist in the first place. The results of one is not nearly the same as the result of the other. One causes undue hardship or loss to everyone else, the other does not. It might seem unfair to pay for an unwanted child but it is certainly MORE unfair to deprive the child and make the general public pay for it instead of the parent.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
              0
              0