Being logical literally is not rational

A theif runs away, he went to my house so he must be a theif. But he can change, so he's not a theif. Buses are long, some cars are long, therefore some buses are trains. That's not rational, buses are not trains, it's a flawed argument. Someone admits this is logic, but amongst the most rational bullies it's shitty logic, and I admitted it was shitty. It was a blessing to have the book, I expected someone not to want my book on logic, when I did logic I was in trouble, justifying everything, people were always talking to me, when I say "talk" I don't mean a chat between friends, I mean they make anti-rational arguments to disjustify rational conduct, to stop having a reason for everything, you would think this is good, but here's what's wrong with it: people don't react to rude people, and bullies don't react to cowardly people or weak people, they only respect you when you're reasonable. That's why reason is good and logic is bad unless it's logic from a reasonable solipsism claim such as yes I admit you exist and you may be an unauthentic copy of an existing person but I'll never wake up and you'll never believe me, it's in the higher world, not observable, and by my evidence that reality is suspicious, I suspect there's something wrong with its facade of being real, because it's fake and it wants to fool me, so I'm two brains: the brain in my head and a real brain in a jar. I found it suspicious that rationalism is rational, because idealism is by definition rationalism but it's not objective like rationalism, however it's cybernetic rationalism, damn bastards, someone must've killed me and made me think I'm alive and put my brain in a jar. That's God for you, what makes me feel good and gives me the sense that I'm good is a reject and so many people choose the reject, they love what people hate, it's fate, I think it's great, and I love my mate. But brains in jars is not rational, making computers is not rational, and finally being in the matrix is not rational, people make weird things that light up like silly toys and they call it science and intelligence, it's not rational, it beeps and makes noises, the whole thing is crazy!

it's not rational 0
logic is rational 7
being rational is an excuse 1
being rational is a reason to be bad 1
justifying your justified behaviour is justified bad 1
it's justified good 1
evil is subjective therefore quality doesn't exist 1
evil is subjective so of course it's real 0
reality's objective, it's a curse 1
poll creator's a pessimist 2
other (be awkwardly honest) :) 2
Help us keep this site organized and clean. Thanks!
[ Report Post ]
Comments ( 22 )
  • misca

    Didn't read your post. It was too illogically structured.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • It was saying that logic is irrational. :)

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • NotFloydzie

    Your story is too long. I didn't read it.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • I don't believe in moderation, too much is a good thing, a little is never enough.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Wendell

    I think
    You stink

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • I'll sweeten it, it takes 4 or 5 years to learn a philosophy or even what wisdom is real truth: the disciple (internet nerd) takes for years to discover the truth of philosophy and learn his past was a life experiment of truth which had a good theory, from personal experience if logic is literally logic: the anti-fun, boring simple pemises and conclusion which is not itself true, there's going to be trouble, anti-fun is not philosophical calm, it's trouble. Truth is not what you want, on the contrary that's why I gave up flawed logic.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Captain_Kegstand

    Paragraphs dude, paragraphs.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • It's a single paragraph, I prayed my poll would get approval, it exists now.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Dad

    I think (?) in your long irrational illogical paragraph, you are trying to say that being rational is not good.

    Put it this way, if you had any rationality yourself you could have placed more thought into your argument (possibly rant?) and asked some clear questions to see if something is normal or not.

    Being rational and reasoning all things around you will help you gain knowledge. Things such as computers (that you brought up) have helped people to process and document facts to be more easily accessible (ie if a doctor calls up a disease and wants to find the cure)

    With the introduction to the Internet we can now share these facts and reasoning together and finally rid the world of myths and legends that were never true, or rational.

    Next time you write something, place a little more effort into it, if you want a clear direct reply.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Pardon me, fusspot old lady, if you don't like it, then get the fuck out!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • I sharpened my reason and came up with the only rational philosophies besides logic, which are true: read the book "On Bullshit", an American patriotic book of what bullshit is and what is true, that's one philosophy I applied from a book store not in the USA, the book got imported into Australia, then I applied the following: epistemological solipsism, Platonic Idealism, and ethical subjectivism, and I stuck to all four of them consistently ever since, but I'm philosophical even with my own thing, e.g. I simply pursue wisdom, which is by the way judicious, prudent, insightful, inner depth, experienced, and I learned to be calm in the midst of turbulence, with an attempt at scientism, sense and reason, if for instance I say a train is long, a bus is long, and trains are buses, it doesn't make trains buses, thus the simpler of two theories in Ockham's Razor is the best one, they're both long: one's a train, the other's a bus, so logic is false, and lies are therefore not rational.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
    • Au contrair, I do it not to make you agree with my polls or stories, but to make you love me or hate me, getting hate mail from people like you is brilliant, it gives you your own beliefs to think about, that's why polls and stories get approval from judges who allow that stuff on the internet.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Dad

        My understanding is all IIN polls/questions are for YOU.
        What I get out of it is not important to anyone, nor does it effect my own personal feelings on any subject or matter.

        In contrast, I relate better to people who reply with nonsense, because at least those 'trolls' or waste of space posters are truthful to themselves.

        I would like a meter placed on each post to state how authentic a post could be. This can be accomplished by knowing if the original 'Anonymous Poll Creator' usually spins shit or not.

        But I suppose that's a question for the Mods!! ;) ;)

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Is It Normal said to keep it real, what I stated was my opinion, it's authentic enough, people don't lie on Is It Normal, what can't be believed isn't to judge what the internetties think, if they find that it's an opinion it's not bullshit, that's just an opinion.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Dad

            I'm only replying to this one (of your multiple post replies!)
            I agree.
            If an opinion is against my own that does not make the opinion less important.
            Plus all opinions (adhering to all policies) are welcomed and justified.

            I have no issue with that.
            But I still (personally) like to source the posts that 'seem' to be more realistic in my opinion. ie Personal opinion.

            And I won't 'get out' until they kick me out!
            Of course being their personal choice on the matter.

            By the way don't kick me out, as I don't make new (second) accounts ever.

            Comment Hidden ( show )
        • Beware, your powers of silliness don't overrule the brain of the universe!

          Comment Hidden ( show )
        • The original anonymous refutes your anti-intellectual argument, people don't believe a statement just because it's objective, it's not phony just because it's excessively subjective, if science knows the physical and can prove things you like to think, then reality is in your head, respecting science it's truth if not proof in itself, following laws of nature scientists don't state to you that you are telling the truth just because you can't prove a subjective, but they do prove possibility, i.e. the fact that I'm in this body I'm in when I created this comedy. Attack of the soft reality out to get the unbeliever!

          Comment Hidden ( show )
    • No, I'm saying frankly that logic is not rational in itself, logic in other forms besides logic, such as rationalism (not labelled "logic") is obviously rational, I'm saying anyone can be more rational than flawed logic which I'm trying to infer that more rational than a logician is good.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
  • my head brain agrees but my jar brain doesnt so i'm in two minds......

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Just a theory, I got deeper. Realism begs the question: if I had two brains, a physical one and a supernatural one, then supernatural solipsism needs rationalism behind the fact that it's unprovable.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • if you say so that sounds right

        Comment Hidden ( show )
  • Riddler

    You are too illogical to understand how logic works. Your logic is flaw meaning you are irrational. Believe it or not Rational and Logical are Synonyms.

    Comment Hidden ( show )