Skeptical about what i read
Anytime I hear a claim by science I wonder why everyone takes it at face value as a fact just because they say it is. For example "humans have had small canine teeth for 4.5 million years and the teeth were not for eating meat they were for fighting over mates". Most people would take that as a fact but I look at it and I wonder their methodology. Obviously there was no cameras back then. There was no written language. So there is obviously gonna be some assumptions here by scientists in this claim. This is something I just read on internet that some scientist said. Im not calling him stupid but I think theres a good possibility thats all horse shit and we have canines because our ancestors were hunter gatherers and ate mostly meat. But maybe I'm too much of a "conspiracy theorist" and should trust everything I read from authority no matter how unrealistic it sounds. After all this person went to university for a long time.