Is it normal to do drug references?

Drug references are naughty, as a long time ago my stories contained strong drug references, they were stories of smoking marijuana, sometimes the drug references were the references to drugs and not the use of drugs: e.g. they involved showing the drugs but no one was using them, that's why it's drug references, and people thought that was bad. Some films contain drug references, e.g. Orange County, it involves showing drugs but not using drugs (it also contains some sexual references and coarse language and adult themes). It's hard to write about drug references. And the songs you hear contain drug allusions (a type of drug reference). The drug references in some of my stories were so strong that you would feel high, but they were really drug use (and some references), as I prefer action and not references. The smart ones are very involved in references rather than actions, they think,they write, they study, but they're not taking action: e.g. they're not playing football, and they sometimes refer to drugs. I like a good reference to sniffing cocaine, what about you? Or the references to snuff, or references to alcohol. However, comedians use a lot of drug references, they talk about smoking pot, the drug references in my tape, said "drugs are good, in a way that it gets you stoned!", that really pokes fun at drug references, rather than being an anti-drug reference, it's a pro-drug reference, it's making light of drugs. I never liked anti-drug books, they suck, but now that there's freedom of expression, books nowadays make light of drugs, and that's naughty! I used to think "just cut the crap and smoke a bong!" but I no longer make light of drugs, and unlike everyone else, I don't make light of medicinal drugs either, is that normal?